Friday, February 24, 2023

The Delta Snake Review




A MONTHLY ONLINE PUBLICATION 
EDITOR & PUBLISHER: AL HANDA
Contents Copyright 2023 By Al Handa unless otherwise noted.



MARCH ISSUE:

- Interview: Michael Des Barres
- Top Ten Glam-Rock Albums Of The 70s
- Classic Album Review: Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music
- Classic Album Review: Stephen Stills 2
- Blues, Rap, and ChatGPT - Part 2
- Gear Talk: Fender Blues Harmonica

QUICK TAKES: 

- Will AI Replace Musicians?
- The Revolutionary History Of The Charango
- Industrial Dance And Shuffle - Arms Versus Legs?

Special Preview: Excerpt Of Episode 3 from Vintage Musical Instrument Reviews - A Myth Busting Primer For The Layman - The Regal R-210 And Thoughts On Parlor Guitars In General 



Michael Des Barres graciously granted The Delta Snake Review an interview on February 24th which covers highlights from his early careers as an actor and rock star. It also covers his long career as a DJ for Little Steven's Underground Garage on SiriusXM and the documentary about his life released in 2020 and still on several streaming sites.

Des Barres started his remarkable career as an actor at age eight and landed his first movie role in the classic 60s film, "To Sir, With Love," starring Academy Award Winner Sidney Poitier.

Michael became a Glam Rock star with the band Silverhead in 1972, who released two studio and a live album before disbanding. He moved to Los Angeles to marry Pamela Miller (an actress and member of the infamous GTO's) and formed the band Detective, who Jimmy Page signed to Swan Song Records.

He also continued his acting career in the 80s with appearances in WLRP In Cincinnati, as the character Murdock in the original MacGyver, and other roles in TV and film continue into the present. Those are too numerous to list here, and the reader can check out his website and IMDb listing for a full filmography.

Also in the 80s, he formed a band with ex-Sex Pistols Steve Jones, Blondie's Clem Burke, Nigel Harrison, and the Sales Brothers (from David Bowie's Tin Machine), who opened for Duran Duran. That led to being asked to front Power Station after Robert Palmer left. He also co-wrote a number-one hit with Holly Knight in 1983.

Michael added radio broadcasting to his resume in 2014 as a DJ for Little Steven's Underground Garage on SiriusXM (channel 21), which he still does.

A highly acclaimed documentary about his life began streaming in 2020 (details in the interview).

It was a phone interview, and though there were planned questions, it wasn't necessary to follow a structure. Michael is down to earth and an excellent communicator, and he gave me a candid and entertaining account of his early life. We then covered his current projects to close out the conversation.

Note: All of the images in this interview are reprinted from Michael Des Barres’ Instagram account with his permission. He retains all rights to these images.

What follows is an edited transcript of the conversation:

Q: In your first credited film role in "To Sir With Love," was acting your main ambition at the time?

Well, I didn't have any ambition; I just wanted to enjoy myself. I mean, which would cover all of your questions? After finishing eight years of boarding school, I got a scholarship at Corona, a drama school. Colombia executives came to the school the first month I was there, and we each had to do a soliloquy. I got the cake, a role in the movie (To Sir With Love) at the age of 17!



So I went to Pinewood. I didn't have any ambition, but I knew I wanted to be in the arts, whatever that would be. I didn't know yet. But the first gig I did was in a great movie. That really appealed to me; it was so fantastic.

The Mind Benders were there (in the movie), you know, the band called the Mind Benders, I saw them, and I thought, that looks good.

And, of course, in school, I was into the blues, just like every other young Englishman at that time, and really loved the music. So then the Stones came along, then the Small Faces, and I thought, god, you know, and even post-To Sir With Love, I did a lot of work as an actor (expresses amazement at the turn of events). 

I did the Young Shakespeare Company; we toured Europe with Hamlet, and I came back to London and thought, I really want to play music. I then got a role in this musical called "The Dirty Show in Town," and it was a nude musical!

I became friendly with Andrew Lloyd Webber because I sent him a demo for Jesus Christ Superstar (the musical). He said you really should be in a band and create a band, and I did.

And that was that, and the band was Silverhead.



Q: So that's actually how you got into music? It wasn't because of a particular star or band like The Mind Benders?

No, I never thought I'd do it, playing music. The band, the Mind Benders, plays at the end of the movie. I don't know if you're familiar with the movie, but it ends with Lulu singing the title song with them in the background. I was so excited that I thought, wow, that looks good, and they let me play the guitar. I thought this was fantastic; I'd love to do this.

But I carried on with acting for a while, and as I said, Andrew Lloyd Webber said you've got to sing and introduced me to Purple Records. Purple Records had Ian Gillian, and Ian; he was singing as Judah in the Demos for Jesus Christ Superstar, the magnificent musical.

I signed a deal with them, and then we set up this ad in the Melody Maker, wanting very thin, gorgeous musicians (laughs). The first five dudes to walk in, we took them, and they were fantastic. I didn't know anything about the business! I thought a P.A. was a personal assistant. I didn't know shi-!

Q: When you all formed Silverhead, did you have an idea what the sound would be like?

No, I just knew it was going to be Rock and wrote many songs. I was 19 and sat there with an acoustic and wrote "A Superman" with "My Baby," and all those songs with Rod Davis, and some I wrote on my own. I don't know how I did it.



Q: I heard that story, you know, where Andrew stuck Mick and Keith (of The Rolling Stones) in a room and told them they're not coming out until they finally wrote a song.

Yeah, but I didn't; I didn't need any encouragement. You know, they were way before me. I just had a big guitar. I lived in Hampstead, and I would go play music and just sped the songs up and used the typical three chords in a blues formula, added sexy lyrics, and boom, boom, boom.

Q: So, were you basically trying to find your way in music?

No, I didn't want to. I've never wanted to find my way. I just like singing, and I like writing. I don't have any formula now. There's no formula to my life. So, no plan.

Q: Later on, when you formed Detective, it was said that it came from a conversation you had with Jimmy Page after a Silverhead show.

Not really, well, sort of; I was friendly with Zeppelin, and they liked Silverhead. We were playing one day in Birmingham, and there were about 20 people in the club, and four of them were Led, Zeppelin. We returned to the house, spent a couple of days of madness, and became friends.

And later on, when Silverhead had collapsed for various reasons, and I fell in love with this woman, Pamela, I wanted to come to Los Angeles, which I did after the band broke up, and a guy put me up in his house and he, shall we say, somehow was interconnected with the rock and roll Vikings.

I put this band together with Michael Monarch, John Hyde, and Bobby Picket, called Detective, and away we went. We made that first album, then a second one, and then we broke up (laughs).

Q: Let me backtrack for a second. Obviously, meeting Pamela was a pretty big event in your life. How did you meet her?

I was making a movie in New York; I can't even remember what it was called "Arizona Slim." It was a Warhol movie that initially had Keith Moon, but he'd thrown himself out of the window or something. They wanted a rock star, an English Rock Star, and I just happened to be in New York. 

I went and did it, and Miss Pamela was the star of the movie, and I was married to somebody else for three weeks. It's terrible, awful. It's all in the documentary, by the way. There she was, and she was the most beautiful and smart woman. So then I moved in with her in L.A. and never went back to England. I would go back a couple of times, just for promotional things, for movies.

Q: Was Warhol the Director?

No, He never directed the movie; it was by the young filmmakers surrounding him. You know, he never produced a record either, but he's got all of those titles. But it was under the auspices, talent, and vision of Andy Warhol. Those endeavors were created in his studio, and the movie was one of those.



Q: One of your most famous periods is when you joined Power Station after Robert Palmer left. Was that just to fill in for the tour or a side project for Duran Duran?

It was a side project for John and Andy and Nicky and the other one, can't recall his name, you know, they did it with Simon. They had another band, you know, I can't remember the name of it, but Robert Palmer was the singer in this case and recorded the album "Power Station" with them.

I had just written "Obsession," and it was number one all over the world with Holly Knight. I was staying in, in Texas or somewhere with my friend, Don Johnson, just making a movie, and mysteriously got a phone call from a promoter in New York called Wayne Forte. He said, Michael, what are you doing this summer? I told him, enjoying the incredible success of this song with Holly.

Wayne said, well, there's a band that's just lost their singer because he didn't want to tour to twenty, thirty thousand screaming girls, and that was Robert Palmer. He said, would you like to come to meet them?

They flew me to New York, and then I got into the limo I demanded (chuckles) and was taken to this office. I went up to the fourteenth floor, and John and Tony Thompson, the greatest drummer ever, were sitting in front of me, very nervous; they knew me because the band I had with Jones (ex-Sex Pistols), called Chequered Past, we'd opened for Duran.

They thought I'd make a good singer for the band because I knew how to move an audience, and Robert Palmer really wasn't into that. That wasn't his thing. You know, to get twenty thousand kids going. Just not his thing.

But that guy is brilliant; I was a huge fan of Palmer ten years before Power Station because he was, like, the English Marvin Gaye; the guy was amazing. So, I had three days, and we were at Live Aid four days later.

Q: I saw that it was a good performance.

Yeah, I had four days to rehearse 30 songs.

Q: That was longer than Led Zeppelin had.

Yeah, it was an amazing feeling; we didn't do all those songs at Live Aid; we did them during a six-month tour. I think we only did two songs because Andy's amp blew up, and Bill Graham nearly killed him! I was laughing; there's all the footage of me just laughing because it was so ludicrous to me that I was playing to 2 billion people, and Madonna was, like, looking nervous in the corner with the bracelets, jingle jangling with the nerves and talent, and Dylan sort of smoking feverishly. I mean, it was an amazing experience.

Q: Sure…

You cannot imagine what backstage was like. Mick, Keith, Dylan. You know (laughs), hello? And me. It was just shocking. The most exciting thing about it was we stayed in the same hotel. Can you imagine what that night was like? There's a movie!

Q: It'd be something I'd remember for the rest of my life.

Yeah, I try to forget! (laughs) It was crazy that night; superstars all drunk, you know, stoned, but I had such a ball. I just exploded out there out of sheer fear and joy!



Q: Can we let's talk a bit about your radio program, the Michael Des Barres Program? I believe it runs daily and then rebroadcast on Little Steven's Channel. Where can people hear it?

It's on Sirius XM, Channel 21. It's from five to eight in the morning on the East Coast and from 09:00 p.m. to midnight on the West Coast, every day, Monday through Friday. It's a three-hour program.

Q: When did the show start?

What happened was Steven (Van Zant), and I met when Chequered Past opened for him 30-40 years ago. It was me, Jonesey, Clem, and Nigel of Blondie, and Tony Sales, Soupy Sales' son, amazing guitar, he was part of Bowie's Band (Tin Machine), a really great rock band, and we opened for Stevie Van Zant, and that's where we met.

And then, years later, I had an Internet talk show, and his beautiful wife Maureen heard me interview Marianne Williamson, Pricilla Presley, and many of her favorites. Andrew Loog Oldham was the morning D.J. at Sirius Channel 21 for Steven's Underground Garage, and he left. They needed somebody, so she said, get him; he knows what's happening, what's happened, and what will happen (laughs).

Stevie gave me two weeks to do the show and, after that, said, " Do you want to be the morning D.J. at Little Steven's Underground Garage? " I said, " Yes, I certainly do, and I've done that since for almost nine years.



Q: Live radio, that's an exception these days, isn't it? I mean, a lot of radio stations are automated now, aren't they?

We are at X.M., except we are the only station that anybody should listen to because we play everybody, from The Temptations to Green Day, and we are the absolute exemplary champions of Rock and soul music from both The Sixties and Tomorrow. If you don't listen to it, you're out of your mind because the rest of it is crap.

And I say that I say that with a degree of, you know, I don't really mean that it's all terrible out there and we were better. I don't mean that at all. There's so much music out there from different generations.

We're playing music that is historical in a sense. It would be comparable, I suppose, to Beethoven or going to see Mozart or something. When you hear John Lee Hooker, you realize where all this stuff comes from. It's inspiring to hear music from the Past.

It's also that I play people that are very similar to their (listeners) idols and talk about the history of Stax, Atlantic, Chess, and Sam Phillips with Sun Records, and I get into the history of it. So there's a map that people can follow and thus enjoy the song more because they know why it was written, who wrote it, and all of those things.

I don't just play music. I talk about the music.

Q: Yeah, The Delta Snake Review has its roots as a blues publication that started in the early eighties. I was privileged to meet some people like Big Mama Thornton, Eddie Taylor, and Lowell Fulsom.

Well, we play all those people, then again, we play what they inspired. So there's a history there, a connection. There's no connection between when you hear Greta Van Fleet, who completely copies Led Zeppelin. I mean, they're really terrific, but there's nothing new there, you know?

Yeah, so that's why, if that's the case, I would rather play the motivational bands that created that music; The Faces, Rod Stewart's voice, Terry Reid, Steve Marriott, all those people that sang in that bluesy way. It's been my fascination, and that's what I do. So it's just a question: What do you want to hear, and how do you want to hear it?

In my case, I give the listeners all the facts to help them enjoy the music more. I'll use an example with Howling Wolf, who, in the fifties, was famous for his brilliance, "Backdoor Man," all of those great songs.

But he also created a medical plan for the members of the band; they would be taken care of, which is an incredible thing to do for a Black artist in the South in the fifties. That generosity and thoughtfulness is something that people don't realize about them, about how difficult it was for the black artists in those days to get anything together, or like Big Mama Thornton, Elvis took her song, and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

So it's a fascinating subject, and Rock and roll and soul music is my metier, as they say in French.

Q: Now, there is this craze about A.I., how it'll change the arts.

I don't know anything about that. I think that's robot stuff, like a Steven Spielberg movie! I have no interest in any of that. I'm interested in Rock and Soul music.



Q: Do you think that shows like yours prove that people still prefer to hear music from a human curator?

I don't even think about that; I know that people who listen to us love music, not, you know, what drumstick was used for James Brown or the kind of flute from this guy. I'm not interested in any of those scientific equations or technical detail. I'm interested in the music that was created in the sixties and fifties and even before that. There's Charlie Patton and his guitar; I'm interested in that music. I'm not interested in synthesizers.



Q: One final question before closing; you mentioned your documentary, Do you want to tell us a little about that?

Yeah, it's amazing, and as you can imagine, I've just briefly talked about my life, but I've worked with amazing people who are in the movies; Van Zant, Don Johnson, Gabriel Byrne, John Taylor, etc., Etc., I was in "Murdoch" and "MacGyver." I've been through a lot of chapters in the history of show business, the wives and drugs, and started the whole thing about R.A.D., which was Rock Against Drugs; I created that.

So my life has been really amazingly different from one year to another, and the people who have been important to me during that time are in the documentary. You can see a vibe that goes through it: fear, joy, drugs, sobriety hits, and misses (laughs). It's a story that is pretty fascinating.

Am I Elvis? No, you know, am I Steve McQueen? No. Am I Alan Freeman, the famous Disc Jockey? No (laughs)

I just had a fantastic life and enjoyed every minute of it. The most important thing is that I got sober all those years ago. Forty-one years off of drugs and alcohol, and I don't recommend it.



Q: Where can people see it?

Amazon Prime, it's all over the place. Just put in, "Who Do You Want Me To Be? I think it's on Hulu, other places?

Q: I'll make sure there's a good list for people. Actually, I think you've had the kind of life that I think a lot of people would love to experience.

Not everything's about fame; it's about what you see and experience. It's hard work, you know. You absolutely have to get into the vibe of really studying.

You know, you ask yourself, what do you want to do? It's not a makeshift thing. You have to be ready, and by that, I mean you have to know your shit, know how to do this, because the business, it's very, very harsh. It can be really hurtful when your record doesn't make it, and that's happened to me innumerable times, where I've been in a band, and I thought, wow, this is it, and it wasn't.

You have to ask, Do you learn? It doesn't defeat you. It makes you stronger. I think that's why I lasted. I became 75 last week, fully intend to be a hundred, and still working.

INFO: 
Michael Des Barres

Note: The Documentary is free on Freevee, Kanopy, Roku, and Tubi TV. It’s free with subscription to Fandor, and can be rented or purchased on Amazon Video, YouTube, Google Play, Microsoft Store, and Apple TV.



THE TOP TEN GLAM ROCK ALBUMS OF THE CLASSIC ERA (1971-1976)

The Glam Rock era began when Marc Bolan of T.Rex performed Hot Love on the BBC in the early 70s. He wore a glittery satin outfit that gave him a decadent androgynous look, a combination of fashion and rock later taken to the limit by David Bowie, Roxy Music, Slade, Mott The Hoople, and many others. That combination of glitz and sexual ambiguity also influenced mainstream stars like Rod Stewart and Elton John.

The examples also show that it encompassed a diverse range of musical styles. There wasn't a single definitive sound. It was really about the show.

If you look it up on the Internet, the most common reason for Glam Rock was a reaction to 60s Psychedelic and other genres that began to develop what was called the "denim look." That might be true. The basic fashion aesthetic had been around for quite a while; the legendary Little Richard shocked audiences with his dazzling costumes, and in Pop, the glittery Liberace was as androgynous as a pianist could get until Elton John. Actually, come to think of it, all three were pianists. Mere coincidence?

The other thing about Glam was that despite massive music media coverage, only David Bowie would cross over as a major star in the United States. T.Rex had the immortal hit single, "Bang A Gong," and Mott had FM hits with "All The Young Dudes" and 'All The Way From Memphis," but the occasional hit was about all that arose from what was a very English phenomenon. 

This means that if you're a true music fan in the States, it's an area to explore and discover new sounds and deep cuts that influenced even the grimly anti-fashion Punks (who made their own fashion statement).

In the olden days, music writers had to describe album cuts in detail to not only give the reader an idea of what the music was about, but unless it was played on the radio for free, reviews had to help the industry sell records. These days, descriptions of any album or song can be shorter as the music is easily accessible on YouTube or streaming services like Spotify. That also frees listeners from reading lengthy reviews that could read like a bad Beat novel or feature long, turgid passages that often reveal more about the critic's mindset than the music.

So, here are the top ten Glam Rock albums of all time, in no particular order, and I'll focus on context and personal observations with the knowledge that any of my statements can be immediately checked, the music listened to, thus helping the reader form a quick judgment as my competence and level of intelligence.

All I ask is you count to ten before hastily condemning my level of taste and ignorance.

One important note, I listed albums purchased and listened to as a teen, not ones pulled off an existing list on the Internet. The comments and impressions come from my memories of that era. How these discs are viewed now isn't a part of this essay.

TOP TEN LIST


Roxy Music (Self-Titled Debut):

My introduction to Glam Rock was at Winterland in the early 70s. I was there to see Steve Miller, Mike Bloomfield, and Roxy Music. Like most of the crowd, I had no idea of what I was seeing. The lead singer was in a 50s leather outfit, but two sizes too small, so his wrists and ankles showed. A guy, who I mistook for a woman with the Lauren Bacall silk pants suit thing going on, was playing what looked like a pinball machine, and a guitarist with insect sunglasses.

I noticed that the crowd looked bewildered, and some were openly contemptuous; for a high school record geek, that was the sign that this group might be worth checking into.

I usually stopped by a record store on the way home from school and chose the one owned by a hippie guy who always seemed to know the latest sounds. He also stayed up to date on the bands coming through the SF Bay Area and made sure their records were in stock. Sure enough, he had the first Roxy Music, and I went home with that and a few other discs that he helpfully suggested needed to be a part of any serious music collection.

I recognized two songs in the live set, "Virginia Plain" and "Remake/Remodel." I'm sure the other cuts had been played, but the song structures were so different that the music made more sense on the disc. Their fashion statement didn't affect me one way or the other. Their album was probably the first glimpse of a much wider musical world than I had seen up until then. It's so experimental that it might not be the best first album to explore Roxy, but for that reason, it's the most classic in my mind.




Mott The Hoople (Live):

Mott the Hoople is one of my favorite Glam bands. There's more of their music on my iPod and playlists than any others in that genre (Except T.Rex). They started in the early 70s as a well-regarded cult band that, as one critic called it, played Bob Dylan "Blond On Blond" style music. They had already begun the transition to a hard rock group through the "Brain Capers" album when David Bowie produced their next album, "All The Young Dudes." They followed that up with two excellent albums before this live set. 

By "Live," their guitarist Mick Ralphs had already left to form Bad Company and was replaced by the wild, undisciplined Ariel Bender. That extra energy (and volume) helped Mott record a classic loud party album that ran through every English Rock cliche and made it kinda sorta maybe new, and it sounded better as the volume knob was turned up. If you want to hear archetype English Rock, this is good as any. In fact, the first time the Sex Pistols' "God Save The Queen" played over the radio, I mistook it for Mott The Hoople.

That's how good they were...



Slade (Alive):

I've always considered them the first AC/DC type band. A hard-rocking band fronted by a vocalist who sang louder than an air raid siren. They also had pop hits, so it was a band that did more than three-chord boogie. The live album was a great way to hear a wide selection of the band's catalog; all played with the amps set to 11.



Sweet (Desolation Boulevard):

The Sweet started as a hard-rocking Bubblegum band with hits like "Willy Wonka" and "Wig Bam Bam." Pretty good stuff, but then came "Desolation Boulevard" with the one-two punch of "Ballroom Blitz" and "Fox On The Run" that melted a few radio speakers in the Summer of '74.

If Led Zeppelin had been a band with a sense of humor, they'd have come up with a number like "Ballroom Blitz."



Alice Cooper (Killer):

This 1971 album took me by surprise. I'd missed his last couple of albums because they played Frank Zappa-influenced rock appearance in the movie "Medicine Ball Caravan," which made me curious enough to buy their first album, "Pretties For You" from a cutout rack. I heard "Be My Lover" on the radio and couldn't believe it was Alive Cooper, but I quickly got caught up. I think his best album was "School's Out," but Killer is the one that made me a fan.



T.Rex (Electric Warrior)

Depending on my mood, my favorite T.Rex album is "The Slider" or "Unicorn." This disc featured his biggest American hit, "Bang A Gong," and it's undoubtedly one of Marc Bolan's most essential songs. The single was so good that even people who didn't like Glam liked it.

One of the things that made Bolan's voice so unique was that he often went with a laid-back vocal over a rocking track. It gave the listener the feeling that a cool persona was singing. Also, T.Rex used high-low harmonies without a nid-range, so it seemed like a person was screeching over the lead, like 70s-era Kinks. It sounds weird on paper, but musically it works. 

His posthumous output rivals Hendrix, but unlike the latter, no session men backing tracks have been added. The number is so high that there are albums in my collection that haven't been heard yet. Yet, being a true fan, I keep collecting the Word from the Master.



Silverhead (16 And Savaged):

This band, led by Michael Des Barres, was the bluesiest of the pack. The rockers in this set wouldn't have sounded out of place on the Humble Pie "Rock On" album with some electric lead guitar work a la Foghat. Des Barres did sound a bit like Steve Marriot, but with a younger, more reckless attitude. 

Silverhead's best album is their live set, recorded at the Rainbow, which is looser and louder. However, 16 And Savaged was the one that got me into the band. It's been reissued as an expanded version with live cuts, and that's the best of both worlds.



Sparks (Kimono My House):

I first saw them on Don Kirchner's Rock Concert when it was a late-night TV show. Talk about an odd couple. Russell Mael looked like a dandy, and Ron came off like a dour bank clerk. Their sound was based on Russell's warbling vocal style, which Ron enhanced with clear, simple piano parts anchored with an amazingly hard-hitting guitar and rhythm section. There were many tempo changes, almost like a progressive rock cut, but there was no mistaking it for Yes. 

Songs like "This Town Ain't Big Enough For The Both Of Us," "Falling In Love With Myself Again," and "Talent Is An Asset" were all wildly imaginative, and I've honestly never heard an album like it since.



The Faces (A Nod Is As Good As A Wink...To A Blind Horse)

Rod Stewart And The Faces never put out a definitive album unless one compiles the Faces cuts on Rod's solo albums, but this one was close. I recall reading a review by one critic who thought the opening cut, "Miss Judy's Farm," was a great opening riff followed by blunt hacking and said "Stay With Me" was a bad remake of Rod's version of "It's All Over Now" off his second solo album. Fifty years later, the review is forgotten, but the album is considered a classic. 

Judging from YouTube videos, this band sounded best live, but they captured a bit of that excitement on this disc. I heard this one first and then worked backward.



Elton John (Tumbleweed Connection)

The first time I saw him was on TV; I believe it was on the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour. He hadn't gone Glam yet, and came off as a sensitive singer-songwriter type performing "Your Song." There was a live album that I don't see on his discography, but I remember the reviews on it noted that his live act has become more flamboyant. This album predates his showier phase, but his songs "Where To St. Peter?," "Country Comfort," and "Burn Down The Mission" are among the best of a strong catalog.



Queen (Sheer Heart Attack)

I got their first album after a record store manager recommended it. Their second and this one soon followed.

I saw them at Winterland in their first Bay Area appearance to support this album. It was a strange show as the music was spectacular, but Freddie Mercury's camp stage presence did something to the audience because they just sat there. After trying to get the crowd going, Mercury noticed and gave up and said, "It's your show, do what you like." This is still my favorite Queen album. It's got a great set of songs, and they were as good a rock band as any. If Mercury hadn't passed away, they'd still be having hit songs; they were that good and willing to keep evolving their sound.

They never did another album like this, though, with a mix that combined pop, camp, metal, and a sense of mystery, making it seem like a single mood. 



David Bowie (Hunky Dory)

It looks like number twelve here, but we'll roll with it. Bowie was probably the definitive Glam Rock star, and his Ziggy Stardust was the breakthrough persona. However, the first Bowie I heard and still like the best was this superb mix of great songs and offbeat lyrics. The most famous cut is "Changes," the coolest was "Kooks," and my favorite is "Queen Bitch," where the Velvet Underground met English Rock featuring the great guitarist Mick Ronson. 

David Bowie still had a lot of great music left to go, but this is the album where his songwriting really took off. This and "Station To Station" are the ones I keep coming back to.

Note: I didn't include artists who were considered "Glitter," like Lou Reed or Gary Glitter. Maybe we'll cover that in a future list.

I also apologize to fans of BeBop Deluxe, Bay City Rollers, ABBA, Alex Harvey, Alvin Stardust, Japan, and a host of others for leaving those out.




- Classic Album Review: Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music

The most common reason a major artist will record a deliberately bad or offensive album is to get out of a contract. To fulfill the contract terms, Van Morrison once recorded an album of short half-ass tunes. The label went ahead and released it, but luckily he created a body of work that earned a reputation that wasn't damaged by that. The Stones recorded a single about a young male hustler called C--------r Blues that gave the label the last release required by contract, which was taboo in its time but relatively tame by today's standards.

This album is awarded the prestigious title of most infamous because it wasn't merely bad or obscene. It was because it was so irritating that even the most ardent fans of the artist couldn't listen to it straight through. There's no naughty language, titillation, or even a bad joke. It was created as a deliberate act of demolition.

That is Lou Reeds' "Metal Machine Music," a double album that went out of print so fast that most New York heroin addicts hadn't regained consciousness fast enough to get to the record store, so copies were going for as much as fifty dollars. It was almost universally panned and wrecked his artistic reputation for a time. 

It was the Peter Frampton and the Bee Gees' "Sgt. Pepper" Movie soundtrack times ten. It had the same nuclear blast radius as Milli Vanilli and caused as much bewilderment as banjo covers of Led Zeppelin songs.

If you Google it, there are a lot of explanations and purported theories behind the music, but all that intellectual mumbo jumbo was probably designed to keep his label from suing him. It was about destroying his then-successful "Rock And Roll Animal" persona.

It wasn't that alien to me at the time. My record collection included experimental works by Stockhausen, Cage, Terry Riley, and others, though I only would purchase those if in a used record store dollar bin. John Cage records sometimes went for fifty cents, and his infamous "Phonograph Music" was a bargain at that price. He and a collaborator dragged a phonograph needle over various surfaces to produce "music" that, sadly enough, wasn't the success that later New Age recordings of whale songs or windmills were, though the results were arguably more listenable than a Nickelback album.

I bought Metal Machine Music as a cutout for one dollar. I did listen all the way through, but the coolness factor drastically dropped off after the second listen, though I will say it had a very cool cover picture of Lou Reed.

I've re-listened to it, so you don't have to provide a track-by-track description. If you like electronic music, give it a listen on YouTube. I'm talking in relative terms here, but it was better than John and Yoko's avant-garde recordings. If it had a sense of humor, I'd have ranked it equal to Butthole Surfers or Sonic Youth records.



Metal Machine Music Part 1: A oscillating drone with squealing sounds that sound a lot like seagulls. One can smell the invigorating salty spray of the sea. Others might reach for a can of WD-40 because they think a door hinge is sticking. There are no wrong answers here.

Metal Machine Music Part 2: The oscillation continues, but the seagull solos have given way to what sounds like a chorus and orchestra rehearsing tuning up sounds in the background. After receiving a revelation that your avocado toast looks like the Virgin Mary, this number is the perfect soundtrack for your new spiritual life. Please prepare yourself.

Metal Machine Music Part 3: Sounds a lot like Part 2. I suspect that this is yet another double LP that should have a single disc!

Metal Machine Music Part 4: I can see that Lou is amping up the energy level for the avant-garde music climax! There are distorted keyboard-like sounds, the ghostly voices are higher pitched, and for a few seconds, he's forgotten himself and added a hint of melody!

While it doesn't reach the supreme heights of the final movement of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, it's at least shorter than the ending of a heavy metal song.

Many artists claim that their music is uncompromising and uncommercial, but give Lou Reed credit, he had the cajones to do it, and after all of the furor he created, the album is still in print. Give it five stars for sheer punk attitude, though listening to it remains optional.



Classic Album Review: Stephen Stills 2 (1971)

Both of the Stephen Stills solo albums, released in 1970 and 1971, received mixed reviews, with the most critical being John Mendelsohn's assessment that it was a work by an artist who was "a solid second-rate artist who so many lower-middlebrows insist on believing is actually first-rate." (The source is Wikipedia but I do remember that review when it first ran in the Rolling Stone). 

Another prominent critic of that era, Robert Christgau gave it a C in his now legendary Consumers Guide. Still, all this was balanced out by rave reviews in the English music press and other publications.

One problem was that Crosby, Stills & Nash (and Young) had previously come out with two undisputed classics, and it was inevitable that critics would hold the solo albums of Crosby, Nash, and Stills to that standard. Stills' first solo album was recorded during group tours and had the feel of a sketchbook full of great ideas that were executed to varying degrees of success. The disc does feature his most successful single, "Love The One Your With."

The second work is the result of ample studio time and has a more polished feel. If memory serves, some of the criticism centered on cuts that seemed inferior to the CSN&Y songs and the use of horns on some cuts. The songs with horns, which sound fine now, shouldn't have been a surprise. Bands like Blood, Sweat & Tears, Chicago, Electric Flag, Cold Blood, and many others had made horns part of the sonic palette of rock, and it was natural to want to experiment with that sound.

The closing cut, "Bluebird Revisited," opens slowly with horns, like the Al Kooper era Blood, Sweat & Tears album, and goes into an uptempo section that adds conga to the rhythm section. It received a mixed reaction at the time, but it was one of the blueprints for Stills' later Manassas group and foreshadowed the pleasant summer sound of the 1977 CSN album and its first single, "Dark Star."

Although Robert Christgau gave it a C grade, he also made a statement later on (in another review) that could apply to this solo work: that a person's feelings towards an album can be influenced by one or two cuts that stand out or really connect.

In my case, I bought this album when I was 17, and what drew me to it were the singles  "Marianne" and "Change Partners," with the cool guitar riffing in "Nothin' To Do But Today." The rest of the album is admittedly uneven, but today, I consider it more consistent and listenable than the first solo LP. As with Bluebird Revisited, many of the arrangements feel like a forerunner of the later period CSN sound. Though David Crosby and Graham Nash were an essential part of the vocal sound, Stills was the music director for the band sound, having played many of the instruments in their first record.

The other horn-suffused cut, "Ecology Song," could divide his fanbase, as it's jarringly different and sounds like it could have come off a Chicago or Blood, Sweat & Tears album. I'm not sure it works, but you can check it out on YT or a music streaming site and make up your mind about it.

The early 70s criticism that many of the lyrics were minor works can be dismissed as the view of a much smaller group of gatekeepers when music magazines were the primary way people found out about music (besides radio). The album sold well, and in today's environment, where anyone who wants to be a pundit has access to do so, the view would probably be overwhelmingly positive. In my case, I've always appreciated good lyrics but prefer to hear the words as sound. If the words sing well, that's much better than it being a heavy-duty message to the people, man.

I noted the guitar work in Nothin' To Do But Today." In his time, he was sometimes underrated, though his work had the hallmark of a great guitarist, which was that you always recognized when Stills' was playing. In particular, his acoustic guitar work was especially unique. 

As one of the members of Manassas once said, Stills turned the acoustic guitar into a rock instrument, which was true even in his Buffalo Springfield days. On their classic "Bluebird," his acoustic work and chording sounded as powerful as the electric guitars. I don't know if anyone else ever picked an acoustic so hard. You can hear his pick really digging into the strings.

It's historically significant to note that the critical opinion in 1971 was mixed. Still, those negative reviews also were expressed in the context of the music scene at the time and a small group of opinion makers. Much of that context either no longer exists, might be right in some cases, or is plain wrong. It wasn't a time when one could go online and hear a whole album; the first description came if and when a publication covered it.

In 2023, only the music remains, and it's stood the test of time. It's still in print, and many of the cuts are on my iPod, music app, and playlists. I liked the album then and enjoy it now.




In Part 3, I ask the ChatGPT three questions about Rap and comment on the answer. I'm going with this format because it would take a detailed book to do justice to the subject of Rap music, and an anecdotal approach is better for casual reading.  I'm also becoming more interested in how the phrasing of the question can shape the Chatbot's answers, and what I'm getting at will be more apparent by part 3.


You might find it interesting that the Grammarly A.I. flagged several grammatical errors and suggested a few paragraph revisions in the chatbot answers. I went ahead and OK'd the corrections. Those who use A.I. to compose articles might want to ensure the output is checked for accuracy and written correctly.


Upcoming article: Battle Of The A.I. Bots! 


Question: Who was the first rap artist?


"The origins of rap music can be traced back to the African American communities in the United States during the 1970s. While many artists contributed to the development of rap music, it is difficult to pinpoint a single individual as the "first" rap artist.


Some of the earliest rap recordings were made by artists such as The Sugarhill Gang, Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five, and Afrika Bambaataa in the late 1970s and early 1980s. However, these artists were building on a tradition of spoken-word poetry and rhythmic chanting that had been part of African American culture for generations.


In short, while there is no single "first" rap artist, the genre of rap music emerged from a rich cultural tradition and has been shaped by countless artists over the decades."


Comment:


This isn't a bad description. However, posing the same question to the Google search engine came up with such a wide variety of answers that I'm just going to show what came up after a ten-minute search.


D.J. Cool Herc, Coke La Rock, Fatback Band, James Brown, Gil-Scott Heron, Last Poets, Louis Armstrong, Ella Fitzgerald, Al Jarreau, Grandmaster Flash, Kurtis Blow, Cold Crush Brothers, Bob Dylan, John Lee Hooker, Blind Willie McTell


Obviously, many contexts aren't mentioned here, and one big influence on the answer is the definition of rap music (by who) and the elements that make a song a rap number. So DJ Kool Herc is an originator or primary influence, depending on how the question is phrased. Some articles state that the Fatback Band created the first rap song and not the Sugarhill Label artists, and so on. The Chatbot specifies that there was no single artist; even a cursory look at the Google result confirms that.


The old debate about whether the Earth is flat or round is a good analogy. Even today, if you say we live on a globe, people will disagree and attack any evidence. In other words, facts are often what people believe, not what they see. If a student uses A.I. to answer a question about Rap music, the output will be both right and wrong to people. 


The main flaw with any AI-generated data is that it has the same access to the data, but the answer will be influenced by how the question is phrased and how much weight should be given to conflicting facts. That's a job that a human best does at this stage of the tech, as the Bot will probably treat data provided by an interested party (like an artist making a claim to be the first) as equal to other assertions.


People will be inclined to treat what the Bot says as definitive, but an area like the Arts isn't like mathematics; there's often no wrong or right answer.


Another question: Who was the biggest influence on the first rap artists


"The origins of rap music can be traced back to the African American and Caribbean communities of the Bronx in New York City during the late 1970s. Several influential figures helped shape the development of rap music during its early years, but perhaps the most significant influence was DJ Kool Herc.


DJ Kool Herc, whose real name is Clive Campbell, was a Jamaican immigrant who moved to the Bronx in the late 1960s. He is credited with creating the "breakbeat" style of DJing, in which he would isolate the instrumental portion of a funk or soul song and loop it so that people could dance to it for longer periods.


Herc's parties, which he called "Hercules parties," were legendary in the Bronx and attracted a diverse crowd of people from different neighborhoods and backgrounds. His innovative DJing style and his ability to create a party atmosphere with his music hugely influenced the first rap artists, who often performed at his parties and used his techniques in their own music.


Other influential figures in the early development of rap music include Grandmaster Flash, Afrika Bambaataa, and The Sugarhill Gang, who had the first commercially successful rap hit with their 1979 song "Rapper's Delight." However, DJ Kool Herc is often cited as the biggest influence on the first rap artists."


Comment


The first question that would come up is who is citing DJ Kool Herc as the biggest influence. A person would have to come up with the source data, which the A.I. doesn't provide. 


Question: Did old blues influence rap?


"Yes, old blues music significantly influenced the development of rap music. Blues music originated in the African American communities of the southern United States in the late 19th century and early 20th century, and it was characterized by its emphasis on vocal expression and improvisation.


Many early rap artists, including Grandmaster Flash, Run-DMC, and Public Enemy, were heavily influenced by the blues tradition and incorporated elements of blues music into their own work. For example, Grandmaster Flash's iconic song "The Message" features a sample from the blues classic "The Big Payback" by James Brown.


In addition to musical influence, the blues tradition also profoundly impacted rap music's lyrical content. Blues songs often dealt with themes of social injustice, poverty, and everyday life's struggles. Rap artists adopted these themes and added their own perspectives to create a new form of musical expression that spoke directly to their own experiences and the experiences of their communities.


Overall, the blues tradition played an important role in developing rap music and helped shape its unique sound and style."


Comment: 


This is a good answer because it's not definitive and most artists will agree that any form of music evolved from earlier genres or cultures. It is a statement without context, but it wasn't asked to provide it.


Final Comment: 


The Chatbot is useful, but it writes textbook-style prose and tends to use stock phrases. I've read articles by experts who say that the A.I. will get smarter as it "learns," but unless the algorithm is made open source, so the learning process is transparent, I have to assume that its education will be at the expense of humans who collect data and do the hard lifting of interpretation and editing.


Until an A.I. Bot can sit at a typewriter or pick up an instrument and create art without scraping the work of humans, it will always be a very powerful collector of ideas, concepts, and work created by humans. It can do that cheaper than humans, which is why it'll become increasingly popular. 


As it stands, it can't create genius but only scrape it.




- Gear Talk: Fender Blues Harmonica


Rod Stewart once announced on a live album, "That's a harmonica, the cheapest instrument you can buy!" That isn't entirely true; the cheapest manufactured melodic instrument is almost always a wooden flute made from bamboo or a similar tube. Americans have applied good old-fashioned know-how and ingenuity to make it a premium instrument. Luckily, an off-brand harmonica (or harp) similar to the ones that old-time sailors and blues artists used can be had for eight bucks or less.


When an American company enters a traditionally low-price market, they follow standard practice and have an overseas contractor make the instrument to spec and put their name and higher markup on it. Fender doesn't make harps, so it's more about the spec given to the contractor (Asian factories don't churn out the same harp).


Parlor guitars used to be relatively cheap until some companies came in and made entry-level models with a 600.00 or more price point. That's happened to a certain extent with harmonicas, with the classic premium Hohner models averaging 40-50 dollars (and more). For example, one of my old faves, the "Golden Melody'" is now 60.00. However, even Hohner ensures the traditional "Marine Band" model stays cheap at ten dollars. They do pay expert musicians to swear that the aspiring blues harpist needs the more expensive ones to become a real pro.


In some ways, that's true. Most old blues legends would have loved access to better instruments but not at today's prices. 




The old bluesman used the cheap marine band for two reasons (besides being cheap).


One, the reeds in a harmonica will eventually wear out from hard playing. Expensive ones that don't have replaceable reeds cost a lot to replace. The Marine Band reeds were more uncomplicated, less sensitive (thicker), and thus lasted longer.


To play in a blues band, you'll need a few or several in different keys (assuming no backups). Even three or four in the basic keys at ten bucks apiece, plus a good microphone (for most electric blues, you need your own mic) and a small amp, will set you back a couple of hundred at least. If you want a vintage-type mic and amp to reproduce the old 50s Chicago Blues sound, then it's over a few hundred minima.


In other words, the harmonica can still be a cheap instrument, but playing professionally can cost big bucks. I believe that's called a 'hidden cost."


However, let's talk about how a harmonica can bring some cheap thrills to your life. The instrument has been around for a long time, whether on ships or at campfires, and one reason is that it has one virtue that makes it a great casual instrument; it can't play a wrong note (when played solo). The harp plays whole notes. That means you can blow up and down, and there won't be a wrong note. The Blues requires two "flatted notes" in the scale, which you get by blowing it a certain way, but that's an advanced skill. Move it around as you blow, even randomly, and a melody will form.


Want chords or half chords? Play more notes at once, and it'll sound good. It may not impress a pro, but it's a great beginner instrument for fun in the living room and much easier than a ukulele. Of course, you must like harmonica music, but you can check out the various styles on YouTube and see what you think.


One of the many inexpensive harps you can buy is the Fender Blues Deluxe. It's around 13-15 bucks, so it costs more than a Hohner Marine Band but a lot less than their first line, which is in the 40-50 range. The "comb," the part with the holes, is plastic, which is easier on the lips than old-school wood, and the tone is quite suitable for folk, country, blues, and ethnic music. Whether it's better than the Hohner, the best way to see, short of buying both, is to check out videos on YouTube and listen to both being played.


I bought this one to replace a Hohner, actually, but it was a "double reeded" type that has what one could say is a more accordion-like tone. Hohner used to make a cheap one with a wood comb that's unavailable now, and the price of a decent double reed approaches one hundred.


The Blues Deluxe isn't that different from the ten-dollar Hohner though there's a slight difference in the reeds, etc., and its tone seems a bit richer. Most harps categorized as a blues type will be. On the other hand, a Marine Band type has a distinctive, rawer tone. If you're serious about finding the exact one that fits, listen to the various brands on YouTube and ask questions on a harp forum. Once you get past the beginner stage, the harp world is as diverse and intricate as guitars. There are different types, and the quality of construction comes into play.


In my case, being a Fender guy, I just stuck with my brand, and it comes with a nice case and cleaning cloth. It's a great Marine Band, and I think anyone would find it a perfect way to start playing.


One last thing about a blues harmonica; On most of the old blues records that featured the harp, the player used old inexpensive models, mainly Hohner's. When you get a Marine Band, it's definitely a connection to a tradition; in that sense, it's not a cheap instrument.




Will A.I. Replace Musicians?

The short answer is that it will replace some, but more in how clubs returned to D.J.s during the 70s disco craze. There are bound to be venues that try A.I. as a gimmick, and the ones who should be worried are D.J.s. which are the easiest to replace.

There are bound to be filmmakers who'll use A.I.-generated soundtrack music and effects to cut costs, and if I were a voice actor, I'd be concerned. However, unless a venue decides to go the discotheque route, it's hard to imagine how A.I. would replace live musicians, except as novelty acts, even with robots. Technology has always changed the music industry. The 78 rpm record changed it; new recording equipment made it possible to record multitrack. Electric guitars and amps had a profound effect, and vocoders have made vocal skills less critical.

And don't get the Industry started on streaming...

A.I. can't do much right now; it's not as good as the hype, but who knows what'll happen as the tech develops. It could be as influential as rock and roll being born or become as pervasive and annoyingly imperfect as autocorrect software or automated customer service. One thing is for sure, if A.I. does cause harm, there'll be a human behind it. I wouldn't watch A.I., I'd keep an eye on the people developing it and using it.



The Revolutionary History Of The Charango:

I talked a bit about the charango in the last issue. However, the instrument does have an interesting story, which may be a myth but a cool one. The legend says that when the Spanish conquered South America, they banned native musical instruments. So the South Americans developed a small stringed instrument that used an Armadillo shell for a body and a stick neck with ten strings, or five groups of two. It was designed to be small enough to hide in a cloak or pants leg easily, and it enabled the player to defy the ban like the Scottish did when the English outlawed bagpipes.

The original type was banned after the late 70s when armadillos became endangered and illegal to ship overseas. Most of the ones still around are pre-embargo, and the modern charango now has wood bodies. For many enthusiasts, this resulted in a better sounding instrument though the native type with the shell has a distinctive resonance, like a Peruvian harp but with less sustain. Those also tend to be crude and harder to play.

It's not clear if the Spanish did ban native instruments, but it's plausible as the Catholic Church did actively try to eradicate any practice that appeared pagan. The ban might have been local, but it certainly gave the instrument a revolutionary aura.

You can hear how a native charango sounds in my song, "A Charango Is Born In the Andes," on the Electric Fog channel on YouTube or any streaming service. I used the Andes of Peru in the title, but Peru and Bolivia claim to be the birthplace of this remarkable instrument. Of course, both may be right, as, after all, I'm sure the ancient borders were different back then.



- Industrial Dance And Shuffle - Arms Versus Legs?

When I want to escape the usual torrent of clickbait stories about 60s artists, I head over to YouTube to see what's new in the music scene. 

Two styles, trends, or whatever young people call music these days are Shuffle and Industrial Dance. I'm a few years late for the boat on those, as those scenes already have an entire subculture going with their own celebrities and sub genres. What I enjoy about both is the music and those young people having such fun. It’s different than watching a video of old rockers in their 70s performing extraordinary feats of muscle memory honed by fifty years of playing the same songs (but more power to them, though I'll pass on paying a grand to see them live).

Shuffle seems to be an eclectic dance form that's like hip-hop dancing but to a wide variety of music. It's mainly about leg movement, sort of like Celtic dancing, and my elderly thighs begin cramping after a few minutes of seeing these remarkable athletes. Industrial Dance is a cool trip too. It's all about the Steampunk Goth look, with intricate arm and upper body movement done to pounding EDM style music with speed metal style vocals. It's prime cult music material but with a lot of people in it.

I'd never have found out about these forms of music, much less trance, trip hip, and a myriad of other styles, on Google news or the push service for my phone. Instead, I generally get a steady stream of stories about the 60s and 70s era rockers, many so quickly written that they show obvious Grammarly or autocorrect errors (yes, it makes mistakes if you don't double-check the text).

Luckily sites like YouTube will push new music to me, and since subcultures thrive there, there are always new worlds to explore.

I see stories about older artists worried about whether audiences will come back to live shows, and yet recently, an EDM festival with over a hundred artists on the bill sold out in 24 hours. It shows that the young have created their own worlds and are often moving faster than the older generation's ability to keep track of them. Sometimes the geezers still think of them as dumb little kids, but it's obviously their world now.

That's a good thing too.






Special Preview: Excerpt Of Episode 3 from Vintage Musical Instrument Reviews - A Myth Busting Primer For The Layman - The Regal R-210 And Thoughts On Parlor Guitars In General 

The Gibson B-25 12 String acoustic guitar isn't just rare because it's a vintage model; it's also because modern small-bodied 12's are rare. I've owned five twelve strings, and three were small-bodied types, and have wondered why that type has died out while parlor-sized six strings have become a popular category.

I do have an idea of why, and this informal history will be related off the top of my head from memory, but unlike more than a few evaluations of a vintage guitar, it'll be based on my actual experienced owning and playing it over a while.

The main reason there were small-bodied twelves in the 60s was that it was considered a good size for a "student" or beginner model. The main drawbacks were less volume and the tighter string spacing made it much harder for those with large-sized hands to play chords.

I have smaller hands, and still found it difficult to form chords on a small-bodied twelve, which was made even harder by the thicker necks (the modern slim neck, the C profile, wasn't a common feature back then), and higher action which made pressing down 12 strings more difficult than six. I could get around the complexity of chording by playing in open tunings, which made playing a chord easier because it only required barring it straight across. However, thick necks and higher action still could make it like squeezing a gel stress ball to exercise the fingers.

Many of the twelves I saw back in the 60s and 70s were played like regular guitars by the simple expedient of removing six of the strings. I imagine that the original owners converted some, but most were because used twelves were common and cheap.

It's been said that this type was dying out in the 40s until blues-folk legend Leadbelly revived it as a folk instrument (along with Pete Seeger). Then, in the 60s, the twelve became more popular after rock groups like the Byrds and Beatles used the electric versions in their records. Although the acoustic type was used in 60s recordings, notably by Glen Campbell, the popularity of the student model didn't appear to last more than a couple of decades. Part of that was easy to figure out; people who wanted to play one because of the Byrds and other rock groups were often told to start with six-string acoustics and, after realizing it wasn't the same, didn't stick with it.

The idea of starting with a "beginner" guitar isn't a bad idea per se. Still, the assumption that most people will continue to buy successive models is based on the idea that you have to start with instruments that don't necessarily sound like what you want to play.

That's particularly true of those told to start on nylon string guitars. Those strings are easier on the fingers at first but are also thicker, and the wider spacing makes it harder to form and play chords.

Plus, it doesn't give the player a path to the sound they want to hear. Most people will buy one instrument, which will be played for fun. If Punk Rock is the goal, a nylon string guitar is just an extra step and expense, particularly in 2023.

You can buy an electric (or an acoustic, for that matter) at prices starting from one hundred (even less used) and pay to set it up, so it's easier to play. Your fingers are going to get sore at first anyway, but an electric is generally easier to learn on because of the lower action and lighter gauge strings.

Most importantly, you know the guitar will produce the desired punk sound with dedication and practice. No matter how good you get on the acoustic, you've got to go buy another guitar and navigate the next round of mansplaining and snob talk by Internet experts who'll declare the electric in your price range is a piece of crap but another necessary step in the American process of spending as much money as possible, and advice from people who haven't actually played the chosen model but base it on opinions by others (most who haven't played it either) and are judging it based on its price and listed specs.

In the United States, the formula for determining how good the guitar is:

Quality = x(y+x) - a(b+c) > f(d+e)

x = number of dollars

y = number of Internet experts who approve of the crap guitar

x = number of celebrities who play the model

Subtracting:

a = number of negative comments on Internet

b = if manufactured in China

c = if modified with after market components that lose value even if it improves sound

If value greater than:

d = Ebay price quoted as real market to get you to sell at a lower price

e = cosmetic flaws that become major price deductions during the haggling process (figure on 200.00 per scratch)

f = level of bragging rights on guitar forum after successfully mansplaining the seller into selling at a low-ball price, plus extra bonus if said seller was made to feel stupid or greedy for trying to get desired fair price.

But anyway, let's get back to those early twelve strings.

End Of Excerpt…

To continue reading this free Vella episode, follow the link:

Episode 3 - 1965 Regal Parlor R-210






SOME PREVIEWS OF MY VELLA BOOKS ON AMAZON:




The Quitters


https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B09PC3L6PC


It's the first book, and after ten months, it's finally developing an audience, and the stats are trending upward this month. I think it's due to the blog and the new book/music video short format I'm using for its promotion. I’ve moved the plot lines away from potentially over technical descriptions of playing live to more emphasis on the personalities and in particular, the main character Nym. Also, some of the romance elements are now coming into play.


It's at 31 episodes, though as an ebook, we're talking maybe 15 traditional-length chapters. I'm keeping the format episodic and short, kind of like a weekly TV show, which works for Vella but will need to be restructured for the ebook.




I, Ivy


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0B3RCBT4D


The story got off to a decent start, but I didn't notice that as it's obvious now that the daily totals on the Vella dashboard can differ or not jibe with the monthly or overall total, which have to be accurate as those numbers determine the royalty and bonus payouts. I'll be paying more attention to this one in March, as it’s being read more than I thought. The latest chapter, Ivy’s view of the efforts by a human to give her a pill should strike a familiar chord.



The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG


This one is a revival of an old humor column I ran in my old "Delta Snake Blues News" publication in the 90s and 2000s. The slant is about survival in the upcoming hard times, but it really will be topical and cover subjects that are offbeat but relevant. The next one coming in a few days will be "How To Shop For The Perfect Expert," which obviously will be a humorous commentary on the use of experts in general.


The ebook “On The Road With Al & Ivy: The Anthology Volume 1 2016-2018 is now on Kindle Unlimited!


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!





Michael Des Barres"Who Do You Want Me To Be? Michael Des Barres

Sunday, January 29, 2023

The Delta Snake Review: A Music And Arts Blog - Early February Issue




IN THIS ISSUE:

- THE BLUES, RAP, AND ChatGPT - PART ONE
LIES, MORE LIES, AND MUSIC HISTORY…AND STREAMING
INSTRUMENT REVIEW: DONNER DLH-003 16 STRING LYRE HARP
A SURVEY OF BUDGET INSTRUMENTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD
- SPECIAL PREVIEW: EPISODE 2 OF “I, IVY” ON VELLA, TITLED “MY GAELIC GARDIAN,
  JEZEBEL”
- SHORT TAKES

All content unless noted otherwise by Al Handa (deltasnake@yahoo.com)



The Blues, Rap, And ChatGPT: Part One

I'm sure most of you have heard about the new ChatGPT and the various views, ranging from embarrassingly uncritical raves to it being a third column for the AI conquerors who'll destroy humankind. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle; there's no doubt it'll be misused, but from my initial exposure to it, it looks like the next wave in search engines. It also has the feel of a paradigm shift and could profoundly change the tech landscape.

I know it's new, but think it will be a great quick and dirty tool for research tasks. However, if you're aiming to write a definitive essay on a subject above the level of regular Internet web content, then using a standard search engine to follow up on every reference is still the best way. It's best to do that anyway to doublecheck the Chatbot's output as it does express opinions and interpretations and hedges a lot. It made some statements that aren't correct and gives kinda sorta maybe nice sounding non-answers for conclusions.

The fact that it occasionally gives out false information makes it Internet-ready, so I'm not sure what the fuss is about. It lies less than humans and doesn't project insufferable fake virtue. However, as the software improves, I imagine it'll soon create text that makes it indistinguishable from politicians and Hollywood  Publicity Departments. The wrong facts here and there are harmless in an early draft; a good writer should check sources anyway and is assumed to have a point of view, so the Chatbot doesn't need to provide one.

I've been working on a piece about the connection between blues, particularly from the 20s to early Rap, and decided to see what the Chatbot would say. 

I'm going to present the answers the Chatbot gave to my questions, and after each one, I'll comment on the provided info. One thing, unless you want bland High School report style writing, this Chatbot won't give you a piece that can be cut and pasted onto a pro-level web page. It'll give you a good rough draft and do some of the heavy lifting.

The idea of using pre-generated copy for news and features isn't new. Newspapers got most of their national and international content from UPI or AP stories which were rewritten or edited by a reporter if not run straight from the feed. Most news organizations who still employ human beings will, if not already, use AI to generate on-time copy and maybe change a few words to make it read better. Political bias can be easily programmed in, so the transition should be seamless.

My initial point and I stress that it's a specific observation, is that there are similarities between early blues from the 20s and 70s rap music that originated from the African American street scene and the Sugerhill Label. I'll give you the Chatbot answer in bold italic, followed by my observations, any corrections, and my own opinion. Interestingly, my Grammarly software asserted that the Chatbot's output had several errors (which I didn't correct).

Question: Tell me about the similarities between Rap music and Blues.

"Rap music and blues share several similarities in terms of their origins and themes. Both genres developed from African American communities, with blues emerging in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and rap emerging in the 1970s. Both genres often deal with themes of struggle, hardship, and the experiences of marginalized communities. Additionally, both rap and blues often rely heavily on the use of improvisation and storytelling in their lyrics. Some notable similarities include the use of call-and-response and the emphasis on the performer's personal experiences and emotions."

That's an excellent standard answer that fits the modern view of both genres. Still, as someone who's listened to Blues since my teen years, I would say that the first half of the answer reflects a bias that Blues is purely about struggle and oppression, which is a view that emerged in the 60s when the demographic of the performers and audience began to include whites. That's a nuanced observation, and I stress that my view is strictly my opinion. The main reason the definition changed is starting from the 60s, the audience demographic began to shift, and most of the studies and documentation about the Blues were written by white scholars, writers, and record collectors. 

Most of those attempts to create a historical record were balanced. In other words, while there is no doubt that African Americans are and were oppressed, that didn't result in one-dimensional art. The Blues was a music form encompassing the full spectrum of entertainment and social expression. The range is vast enough that any opinion about the music can be both right and wrong and subject to dispute or the need to add scope.

I remember writing an article for my Delta Snake Review in the 80s, which listed all the subjects covered by Blues songs in the 20s and 30s and found well over a hundred. The themes ranged from having a good time, lousy time, booze, drugs, historical events, animals, philosophy, politics, sociology, religion, and the full range of sexual preferences. More than a few of the female singers were bi or gay. Unfortunately, most of these themes were bowdlerized out of the canon in the mainstream 60s reissues of blues records (though not in the small label releases).

The 20-30s Blues was also about rebellion and often characterized as "Devil Music" by the mainstream church, and as said in a previous blog entry, that was a theme that came up in classic blues songs like Robert Johnson's Hellhound On My Trail.

A short overview of the Blues would be; that it was part of the more extensive African American Music and Entertainment culture, and the Blues artists were primarily from rural areas like the Mississippi Delta (though every region had a distinctive style). While these artists were performing and recording, there was also Jazz from Louis Armstrong (which continued with artists like Duke Ellington) and other artists. Back then, a "Blues" was a particular type of song or instrumental that used a specific scale. In technical terms, a standard eight-note scale with the third and seventh notes flatted to create a "minor" feel. It was a common number in Jazz and didn't sound very similar to Delta Blues slide or ragtime.

To understand what happened to Blues and how it led to rock and roll, one has to look at how African American popular music evolved, from Blues and Trad Jazz to BeBop, Big Band, to Soul and Rap. That's a general description and omits dozens of developments like Funk, Hendrix-influenced Black Rock and Funk, and of course, Blues which became racially diverse.

The link between early Blues and Rap was that both involved vocal improvisation over what Rap artists call a "beat." In the case of the Blues, that meant a "vamp" or rhythmic music on a guitar that the singer sang over. It was a popular form in impromptu concerts in Jook Joints and clubs and a form of dance music. African Americans, like everybody else, enjoyed entertainment. The blues were also supposed to make you feel good too.

The sixties were a vital era for Blues. Here's was Chatbot said,

Question: How did the blues change in the 60s with white artists and audiences coming in

"In the 60s, the blues underwent significant changes as white artists and audiences became more involved in the genre. This led to a broader interpretation and commercialization of the blues, resulting in a fusion of blues with other genres such as rock and roll. The blues became more electrified and the use of amplified instruments became more prevalent. Additionally, the blues began to be performed for larger and more diverse audiences, which influenced the way the music was performed and the lyrics that were written. This period marked the beginning of blues-rock and marked a departure from traditional rural blues styles."

That's a good answer and perfect for a piece with space or word restrictions. The answer is more complex than that, of course. I would add:

The 60s was a significant era for Blues. So much of the urban Black audience had moved on to R&B and Soul (and Jazz, etc.), which was as natural an evolution as whites moving on from Folk and Big Band, and it became mainly a club-level scene that was still full of vigor and innovative artists. That split the Blues into two main camps; from the hard-edged electric music flourishing in places like Chicago to the older artists from the 20s-30s who were beginning to be "rediscovered" in Folk Festivals and small label recordings. That "rediscovery" label must have annoyed more than a few African Americans, I would think, as the more correct term would be an introduction to a new generation or revival. We'll get more into that in Part 2.

The usual historical line is that the English discovered the Blues and created their own brand that reintroduced the music to America. That's true, but it's more complicated than that. Among the earliest blues that made it to England via old records was 20s jug band music by artists like Gus Cannon, which helped start the skiffle craze, where young men who later formed groups like the Beatles, and got early exposure to music and performing. After that came the stream of other blues and jazz records, and artists like Muddy Waters found an enthusiastic audience for their music.

That, plus the emergence of Elvis in the 50s, changed the course of blues and R&B in America, and that history is out of the scope of my article.

Obviously, I didn't ask the Bot to write an entire article. That's my job as a writer, but exploring how this new tool can assist has been interesting. It could be useful to publications that want to generate a lot of content without dealing with writers or deadlines and want to crank out copy on trending subjects. It also looks suitable for creating bio and introductory sections for the beginning and end of articles and interviews (if the subject doesn't provide one), and straight news items.

So, Chatbot agrees there's a connection, and in Part 2, we'll see what it says about early Rap.




Lies, More Lies, and Music History…And Streaming

History is about what happened,  Science is about what is, Spirituality is about what should be, and the music industry is about selling product.

Historians generally take about a hundred years to sort out the data to develop a balanced view. It's a democratic process where a particular idea can become fact if the preponderance of the evidence is that a majority of opinion says it's so. The process is even more flawed because most people only know what they've read or heard.

Needless to say, in any Democracy, what the truth is will always be in dispute, and fortunately, like in the case of professional sports or rock music, the multitude of conflicting, insightful, or immature opinions rarely cause any real harm to society and the impassioned debates are a good way to blow off steam or give insecure egos a much-needed boost.

A good example is the American Civil War, a subject still causing heated debates of varying accuracy between people who earned the full range of A to F grades on the subject in school. Of course, we could also include the suspect level of scholarship by those who cheat in exams and utilize A.I. Bots to write term papers, but this essay isn't an attack on the American Way.

Back to the example...The Civil War was initially viewed as a crusade to end slavery by one side and a defense of slavery and states rights by the other. There was no Internet, so the thousands of supporting or dissenting opinions were known only to Historians with access to the source documents.

Thanks to the Internet, we now know that most agree it was a Civil War between the North and South, but also that the latter region had its own brand of rock and roll, complete with fans who desecrate their flag by using it as sweatbands, patches to cover holes in pants, and beach towels to sit on just like Northerners do with Old Glory. 

Note: I just gave a single example to represent universal truth.

In other words, history hasn't changed much. It's just that all of the true, weird, suspect, and silly stuff is accessible to all, and that's the way it should be.

Disclaimer: The above example is an oversimplification due to the constraints of creating content without the use of A.I., and the mission of The Delta Snake Review is to entertain modern attention spans with only the pertinent facts before the writer himself loses interest.

Music history is the same intricate web of truth, mythology, trivia, and B.S.; a good example is the rise and fall of 60s rock. 

As said in previous blogs, the single was the favored vehicle for popular commercial Music. The problem was that the emphasis on songs left too much money in the consumer's pockets, which filled American Capitalists with longing and concern for the detrimental effect unspent cash has on yacht makers and the caviar industry.

The obvious solution, the sale of long-playing records, was a hard sell because it forced the consumer to buy a set of songs to get the one they wanted. That was money better spent on station wagons, color T.V.s, and trips to amusement parks.

The 60s saw the rise of the longer format, which continued through the CD era until the advent of digital streaming.

In the decades since that turbulent and profitable time, the body of data has grown bigger than a hippo's butt in an economy-class seat, and it would take an expert to sift through the murky river of facts. 

That's a thankless task that the Delta Snake Review can handle by assigning its expert who has easily met the Internet requirement of having a free email address to qualify as a Historian.

The reason that the Music Industry was able to make L.P.s the main product was simple; they got consumers to regard those as the new single, much as age 60 is the new 40, or avocado toast is the new hot dog. 

Rock artists quickly came on board once they realized that the change would make them rich and express themselves without the fascist restrictions of Top 40 singles. The idea of passive income without having to tour was as compelling as poop to hungry flies.

The L.P.s were marketed as "Concept Albums," "Personal Statements," "Monumental Works," "Song Cycles," "Heavy Trip, Man," and other means of simplifying the melancholy drudgery of choice.

To be fair, these milestones of commercial success were created by artists with a variety of motives that ranged from integrity, artistic vision, personal conviction, passion, educating the public, ending the war, getting B.J.s from young women, free coke, insulation from criminal charges, sweating a lot, wearing makeup, being cool, and so on.

In other words, people were persuaded to buy the more expensive product without complaint, and no rock star would kick a wad of C Notes out of his bed, man.

That Golden Age ended with streaming, giving consumers the power to pick and choose individual songs again and create playlists that aren't influenced by business considerations.

The Vinyl Revival has helped carry on the old-school aesthetic of buying in bulk at premium prices, and that's good also. Anything that adds to choice is good, even if Record Execs and some Artists might resent having to buy their drugs and drive themselves. 

However, while acknowledging the process is brutal to artists who put their hearts and soul into it, it's not anymore so than competition within the industry.

The critical thing to remember is that Music was there before the industry and will be there after. It's said in sports that no one is bigger than the game, and it's valid for Music. If there were no recordings, people would still create it. After streaming, Music will still be there.

The artists and industry Execs who don't like what streaming is doing to their livelihood brought it on themselves by ignoring the complaints of consumers. When listeners got a chance to take Music back, they did. They're not just thieves or people who don't care about artists. It's the industry's job to make customers want and respect the product.

Music is itself. It's not just a product to buy or sell.

If the Beatles catalog disappeared, it would be a loss, but people would just make more Music. As far as quality, tell parents watching their child playing at a recital that its inferior entertainment. They're watching Music being made, and that's always the real joy.

Whether such music is good or bad is a different subject and is only relevant if money is involved.



INSTRUMENT REVIEW: DONNER DLH-003 16 STRING LYRE HARP

The Lyre Harp is one of the oldest instruments and is still used to play "parlor" or front room-type music. The reason is that it's an easy instrument to play (once you get the hang of tuning it) and, like similar instruments like the zither, is ideal for accompanying vocals.

Also, and this is a technical observation that will make sense after playing a lyre harp, the two-octave range (16 notes) gives the player a wide range of sound as the music played can be based on modal or note structures instead of chords. 

The Legendary Miles Davis changed the direction of jazz in the late 60s by exploring modal concepts, which significantly influenced 60s free-form rock.

However, even a 16-string lyre can produce plenty of chords once the player is familiar with it.

Most of that background info isn't necessary except to assure the potential buyer that a lyre harp is an actual instrument in areas where people think serious instruments like guitars have to cost over a thousand dollars. Most people in other parts of the world consider a hundred-dollar harp a bit pricey.

The primary purpose of this type of Lyre is to make music. It provides joy and satisfaction that even the finest records can't match (it's a case of apples and oranges). It also connects the player to centuries of tradition from when audiences in villages listened to primitive harps up through the Celtic Age. Of course, that's a simplification but true.

Although it's played differently, the Lyre is similar to the harmonica, another inexpensive music maker that found popularity in Folk and Country and is a primary soloing instrument in the Blues.

Both have in common that the primary type is tuned to whole notes, which in simple terms, means that it's impossible to play a wrong note. It's similar to playing only the white keys on a piano or tuning a guitar to a chord. 

That's an excellent quality in a beginner instrument. My first instrument as a child was the violin, which I played for about six years. It was tough to play even whole notes correctly, and I saw more than one kid quit playing one because of the difficulty in learning to play even simple melodies. 

I mention the violin because it, along with wood peg banjos, gave me experience in tuning string instruments with a 1:1 tuning ratio. That is to say, there are no gears to make a turn of the tuning peg and not break the string if it's cranked over even a single rotation.

That's one aspect a prospective player should be aware of before tuning a lyre for the first time. Suppose one watches YouTube videos about this instrument. In that case, it's obvious, and the very slight turns are arguably beginner friendly because the notes move up and down in direct relation to the turn of the peg. 

However, having to crank it over a few times to get up to tune isn't necessarily easier. Beginning guitarists always break strings with geared pegs, and hundreds of years later, no one has seriously tried to make violins with geared pegs (though not necessarily a bad idea. Sitars with such pegs are available).

That said, this Donner Lyre does provide extra strings in case a beginner treats it like an Apple Computer and starts just cranking away without learning it first. After the first broken string, the tendency to over-tune generally stops. I've played string instruments all my life and still break a string now and then though I'm now experienced enough to blame it on a defect in manufacturing.

I should note that this review presents information in a different order than usual. It's written as a beginner might see it as opposed to a sales pitch. It's an instrument that will enable you to play tuneful music right from the start, as long as proper attention is paid to setup and tuning. 

The most immediate application will be Celtic Harp Music. The Lyre may not have the same range or richness in tone, but one could say those are considerations that are more relevant to serious players who intend to play advanced pieces or live. Only a harmonica is easier for something that can be left around to be picked up and played for fun.

All beginners will start with a standard whole note scale, and when plucked at random (or seen on YouTube), my point that there'll be no wrong notes will be more obvious.

As far as a point for the future, it is a tuned instrument. Just change the tuning if you want to explore scales with "flatted" or "sharp" notes.

The tuning videos on YouTube are good, but I'd recommend using a decent electronic tuner to make fine adjustments. A beginner's ear won't detect if a note is a bit sharp or flat so it won't be a problem at first, but as the skill level increases, it can make you think you're playing out of tune. If that happens, congratulate yourself; your skill level is improving. 

You can use a clip-on type on the bridge, but my workhorse has always been an ancient Korg CA-30 Chromatic Tuner, which can also tune by sound. It's over 20 years old, hasn't needed a battery change, and the casing doesn't turn to a white sticky paste like cheap modern clip-on seems to do. It can even make tuning sounds, but I never use that.

So, time for unboxing. In the case of the Donner, you get a good enough gig bag, extra steel strings, a tuning wrench (try not to lose it, it's convenient), and light gauge picks.

There are differences between a Celtic-style harp with steel or nylon strings. That's a tonal difference. One should watch videos and listen to both types of Celtic harp music. It's a good idea to do that because one might not produce the sound in your head (believe me, it's there, it's why everyone buys an instrument).

Though a steel string has more highs, how to produce a clear tone is different than nylon. A beginner tends to pluck too hard, creating a scratchy or pinging tone. Instead, start off softly, and let your fingernails slide smoothly over the string, which in the higher notes are very tight and don't need much pressure to produce good time.

This type of harp is quieter, so plucking to try and fill a room with sound won't work at first. But, as you improve and your finger works more surely, the volume will increase. Again, check out the videos to see if getting one with an onboard amplifier is a preferred option.

Note: I refer to videos a lot because music is best taught by listening.

The Donner is a decently priced lyre harp, and the 16 strings have a nice range. More than adequate for a beginner or someone like me who likes adding different low-cost sounds to my instrument collection and enjoys Celtic Music.

The tone is very good if played correctly. It's good enough to record with if you are familiar with mastering software like the free Audify program that can add reverb and other effects. Not every advanced player with a full-sized Celtic Harp may agree, but you can't worry about stuff like that as a novice.

The Donner is a good option if you want to make music at an affordable price. As a matter of disclosure, I got mine as a gift after casually mentioning my intent to get one, but after playing it, I can see that it'd have been a good buy, that is to say, an instrument I'd actually use.

Regarding good beginner instruments considered "serious" around the world, check out the following article, which gives a brief survey of what's out there.

A SURVEY OF BUDGET INSTRUMENTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

Note: Unless noted otherwise, all of the instruments shown were pulled off the Amazon site and easily available. There aren’t any obscure items in this survey.

It's not a criticism to say that Americans think that instruments have to be expensive; it's just one of our quirks. But if the country couldn't afford multi-million dollar fighter jets, it would quickly find a low-cost version to do the same job.

Many in the world music community still play what Americans consider folk instruments. While many stars don't play concerts on the scale of a Taylor Swift or Rolling Stones, artists like Zamfir developed a considerable audience playing the Pan-Flute, which is easy to make and play music people still enjoy listening to.

In other words, talent will always count more than hardware.

Tell a Hispanic that bongos are a cheap toy, and he'll treat those as fightin' words, and a large part of Islamic music is vocals accompanied by percussion. Native American Folk uses percussion and flutes, and a significant form of traditional Japanese music is the solo flute (which includes Shakuhachi).

I remember watching a legendary Jazz Drummer from Brazil named Aierto who demonstrated various percussion instruments like rattles, etc., which struck the audience as an assortment of party noise makers. His wife, the great Flora Purim, then began to sing a slow Brazilian song in almost total darkness, and as the song progressed, each of the percussion instruments came into play and sounded musical.

For the Americans in the audience, it was a revelation, and it drew a standing ovation, but I'm sure for someone from South America, it was just music as usual.

Some of the most esteemed African Folk were made with cheap guitars and percussion sounds by someone tapping a soda pop bottle with a spoon (also used in some old 20s Blues numbers). In old-school Cajun and Zydeco, the percussion is a triangle, which sounds so perfect that it's hard to imagine any other instrument being used to keep the beat. 

I once watched a YouTube video by Daniela Mercury, a star in world music, and her band included percussion players who just used shakers or rattles. A rock band might have the lead singer do that now and then, but in South America, it is part of the group's sound.

The usual advice Americans get is to pick up a cheap guitar or recorder (which can be a serious Medieval, classical instrument) and learn simple chords and melodies. Still, suppose your aim is simply personal pleasure. In that case, the world offers economical alternatives that produce fun music and maybe even connect you to a culture that's in your background or one you admire. Not everyone needs to play rock and roll, which is just a concept and is played in various forms worldwide.

So, with a bit of comment for each one, here's a small list of world instruments that might fit the bill.

Percussion

It's the oldest form of music and is still played worldwide. In America, people still do it in drum circles and for spiritual growth (and the fun of whacking out a beat). In addition, more than a few rock drummers are familiar with percussion and play these as a second instrument.

The one drawback for Americans is the lack of melody (though a good conga player would disagree) and the fact that rhythm section players often don't get the same respect as guitarists or singers. Just play along with records; it'll sound like you're in the band.

The most common percussion instrument in the U.S. is probably the Conga, as even rock bands have used those. Unfortunately, the American talent for making things expensive has made even economy models rather pricey. However, if you're ever in a Latin American country, these can be bought at a lower price.



The ones worth looking at are bongos. There's the image of a drunk surfer or beatnik banging away at one, but if you check out Latin American music videos, it's clear that most good bands have a top-notch bongo man, and for a good reason; along with timbales, it adds a lot of sharp top end and drive to the rhythm section.

When you watch Latin or Caribbean music on video, you'll see the bongo player is having a great time. That's fun you can have, too, even if it's just playing along with a record.

Verdict: Bongo Man or Woman is a cool nickname.



Another drum on the other side of the spectrum is the Irish Bodhran, similar to other "frame' style drums like Native American or Middle Eastern types. It has struts in the back, which you use to hold it, and press a finger or two against the back of the skin to control the tone. The one catch is that the stick, or “beater” is held like a pencil and strikes the head in a sweeping motion that takes practice to master. However, I leaned it just watching a video so that means anyone can. It can be played with the hand also.

Experts recommend tunable types, but those are expensive, and tuning a drum head is more of a professional application. For fun, just press the head with a finger and adjust the tone that way. The best way to deal with someone spoiling your fun by pointing out more expensive is to tune them out (I'm talking to you, America).


Note: Djimbes here sold by African Imports.

African Djembes and "talking drums" are worth looking into. Talking drums can be more expensive as those are rarer, but again, check those out on YouTube and see what you think. The Djimbe does have a hand technique but it’s easy to learn. The talking drum is multi-voices, as the ropes are squeezed to tighten the head to produce different tones.



BjizzleArtsnCrafts


All of the above suggestions are welcome at drum circles, too, so group fun is also an option. Drum music has never disappeared because it has spiritual benefits, and rhythm is always good for the soul.

Verdict: Imagine the drum head is the face of someone you hate, and the smile people see will be attributed to the spiritual effects of the ancient spirits called forth by the healing of rhythm.



Heading over to the other side of the world, for less than a hundred, one can get a small two-stringed Chinese bowed instrument commonly used in their folk music. Of course, it might appeal more to Asians, as the scale system is different, but it's a nice start.

Verdict: No one will know you're playing out of tune, possibly even you. That makes it an ideal beginner instrument.


There is the small-necked Saz from Turkey. For a little over a hundred, with more advanced ones staring at two hundred. That's an excellent scale-up versus the usual advice to buy a thousand-dollar guitar. I've owned one, and it's easy to play and can be used the same way a dulcimer is used in Western-style Folk. 

I remember when it was sold. A young teenage woman came with her boyfriend and said she was interested because it seemed like a fun, easy instrument. The guy seemed a little bemused until she tried it out and, within minutes, started picking out notes. His expression changed to surprise, then a big smile as a simple but nice melody came out of the Saz. She was, of course, ecstatic, and rightly so. She was right; it was a fun and easy instrument to play. 

I used the proceeds to buy a used Les Paul, and frankly, I think she got the better end of the deal.

Verdict: Play a Saz and be the only one on your block (or city) to own one.



The most famous Folk instrument that most Americans haven't heard of is the dulcimer, shown in the picture being played by Jean Richie, one of the legendary Appalachian musicians. Most folk artists know about this one. Other famous artists who’ve played one include Joni Mitchell. The appeal is that it's stayed mostly true to its roots as an affordable pro-level instrument often hand-made by the player.

It's a "drone" type instrument, and it's tuned so that there are no wrong notes. So anything you play will be in tune. It's primarily used to accompany vocals, but Jean Ritchie showed that it could be a solo instrument. 

Verdict: Play the dulcimer, and no man can call you a coward.

The most glamorous cheapie in the U.S. is probably the harmonica, which in the Blues is referred to as a "harp." The standard in-mouth harp is Hohner, but those have gotten pricey, so I've pictured a cheap Fender brand that's just a little over ten dollars. Good old Fender.

Besides the American way of doing things, the top end has gotten expensive because in professional use, the reeds inside wear out or break, and not all are designed to let the player take it apart and replace the reeds. For the casual player, a ten-dollar cheapie will last for years (if taken care of). The appeal for the novice is like most others, it's an instrument one can play immediately, and every note will be correct. It can be used for all kinds of music, and in the blues, a good harp player gets the same respect as a guitar player. Legends like Little Walter and Charlie Musselwhite all led bands. 

Verdict: Play the harp, and you're joining a tradition. After that, it costs a lot more.

Another ancient instrument is the flute, and while the best-made are costly, playable ones can be had for less than fifteen dollars. As wind instruments, there are three types; the vertical Shakuhachi, the regular classical flute, and the whistle type like the Irish or ocarinas.



The ocarina has been played on two rock hits; the Troggs "Wild Thing" and Mellencamp's "R.O.C.K. In The U.S.A." The Peruvian versions here are among the cheapest and coolest looking. The bottom has two holes that are covered by the thumbs. That's a big deal, as that makes key changes possible and dozens of note combinations. It looks like a toy but has a bigger range than a standard harmonica.

Verdict: Very cute decorative pieces if your drive doesn't match your desire.


The Shakuhachi is a vertical flute, which means you blow into it like a soda bottle at a party, except the music doesn't sound like a fart, and by varying the wind pressure, different tones, and moods can be achieved. 

Verdict: Very popular with New Age music fans, and unlike many other instruments, the fewer notes, the better. The Clint Eastwood of instruments.



The Irish tin whistle has always been inexpensive but challenging to play correctly. If played wrong, that clear tone heard on Celtic records sounds more like a shriek. However, practice can solve that problem.

Verdict: If you lose interest in these flutes, you're only out the price of a pizza, but if that bothers you, perhaps the vision to play the music of the Ancient Clan Tribes was never there.



The last is the Pan Flute, which is a bunch of different-length tubes you blow into vertically, like the Shakuhachi. As said earlier, Zamfir became a huge star playing one, and it's still a popular instrument in countries like Peru. The most famous U.S. example is Simon And Garfunkel's "El Condor Pass," a hit off the "Bridge Over Troubled Waters Album."

Verdict: Play a Pan Flute, and you'll get all the chicks. Tell them you know Zamfir.

There's a lot more, but the intent was to give you a little survey of what's out there. Of course, the big guitar companies, with the laudable exception of Fender with their cheap harp, want to sell you a vision of music on premium-priced instruments, but a lot of people in the world like to make music at low cost, and there's always a place for that.

I didn't mention ukuleles because those are well-known. That instrument probably saved a lot of guitar stores during the craze because it brought in many new customers. A lot. Every store I went to quickly stocked up on ukuleles and didn't regret it. The new customers kept coming back, and some moved up to guitars. 

It's a fine instrument, and one of my most treasured possessions is a charango, a Peruvian/Bolivian instrument that's similar (but is more complex to tune). You can hear my charango piece on YouTube, Spotify, Amazon, Apple, and other services. It's called "A Charango Is Born In The Andes." The title is significant, but I'll explain the meaning in a future article on the charango, which has a fascinating and revolutionary history.



 SPECIAL PREVIEW: REPRINT OF EPISODE TWO OF “I, IVY”
TITLE: MY GAELIC GUARDIAN, JEZEBEL


My education at Shitzu University began when my rescuer, a tiny Irish fireball with lots of freckles and bright red hair that smelled like wet dog fur, mentored me in the ways of the world to prepare me for adoption.

My savior went by the name of Jezebel "because any woman remembered by name in the history books must have been a righteous butt-kicker who didn't take any crap from men and a gentle person who liked animals."

Jezebel, or as she was called by the Vet, "Alright, you don't have to shout," made sure that all of us Shih Tzus got first-class treatment, although the good doctor who called himself "I'd have done it anyway without your nagging" always seemed to look relieved when she left.

I'll give him credit; he seemed to really want to bite her leg but managed to restrain that impulse. That would be an admirable quality in a dog.

Jezebel addresses the Vet by many names, but the most common was "Stan." He was an older man, still very skinny, which would make him around twelve years old. Jezzy said his body defies gravity as the beer belly goes up into the brain instead of the stomach, whatever that means, though I think it means that his hair is long like a woman.

Jezebel would come by every day with tasty treats and talk to us. She said lots of people wanted to adopt us and vowed that we would all go to perfect homes. Any owner not meeting the standard would get "a taste of the whip." I'm not sure what that means, but it must be like putting them on a leash.

She was present at the interview with Al, who got the first chance to adopt because he was willing to come in the afternoon. The Vet said before being scolded, "We have a dozen other dogs besides these Shih Tzus; it's first come, first served."

Jezzy silenced him with an ancient Gaelic war cry, then whispered to me, "He's sort of right, but I'll stay with you and make sure this Al is worthy." The Vet, who now calls himself "Fine, but I make the final decision," didn't seem happy about her joining the interview, but since he couldn't bark louder, he had no choice.

As Al walked into the lobby, Jezebel hissed, "The guy wears sandals like some hippy; if I can smell nasty feet, this interview is over."

The Vet sniffed, "I was a hippie in the 60s," and the Irish Maid retorted, "I rest my case." They then flashed the biggest smiles ever seen from two people who wanted to claw each other to death and greeted Al.

I heard them because Shih Tzu bodies are 30% ears with a range of around ten miles.

We're also 30% nose, so I had already sized up his foot bouquet. It smells less than one day old, indicating an obsessive bather (once a month is typical for canines). I smell baby powder in the sandals, so his poop must come out the toes or heel. On first sniff, he seems OK.

I don't understand why humans dread foot odor. We identify you by your unique tootsie aroma. It's not like we can float in the air and look you in the eye. We're low to the ground and see shoes and feet. I've learned that humans prefer to smell like clean paper towels or bar soap.

The doctor spoke first, ignoring the eye-rolling by Jezzie, "Al, thank you for coming in. This is Ivy. Ivy, this is Al. He is interested in becoming your new master!"

I gave the Jezebel response to suitors who wished to put me in bondage and began to growl. Jezzy smiled and said as she petted me, "That's being a good hard to get Bitch." I looked at her with a puzzled expression, and she purred, "It's OK for us girls to use the word."

She began to ask Al questions from a fifty-item checklist created for prospective dog owners, assuring him that weren't any wrong answers though a pattern of sociopathic abuse or exploitation of animals could be detected using this innovative diagnostic tool. Stan left the room muttering, "This shit's gonna take a while," and indicated that he was going to the back room for coffee.

After the screening a noticeably relieved Al was permitted to pet his potential Empress, as the Gaelic Warrior Queen described me.

Al went down on one knee and began to pet me. "That's good," observed the Irish Protector, "You lowered yourself to her level, that's a sign of respect. The Vet rolled his eyes, and the words "You mean bowing to your majesty" slipped out. The resulting eye contact indicated that a duel to the death would occur after the interview.

Walking me outside on a leash was part of the interview to let Al and I get acquainted. As we walked, both were watching from the window. Stan had an anxious expression while the Celtic "Man Whisperer" studied the scene to catch any little flaw in character. There was some elbowing going on, but I think it's a sign that love/hate was in the air for that combative pair.

When we came back in, Stan asked, "Well, how did it go? Do you think you'd like to adopt Ivy?"

Al replied, "Yes, I think Ivy and I would be good together. I think the growl was because of her past experiences, but I think she'll learn to trust me."

Jezebel said, "The adoption contract specifies that you must keep her groomed. I can recommend a good groomer."

Al shook his head, "Thanks, but I'll take care of that myself."

Her eyes narrowed, "What do you mean?"

"I'm agreeing to take care of Ivy, so I'll bathe and cut her hair myself."

That seemed to soften the crusty Celtic, and she said, "I think you'd do it too. I have no objection to this adoption at this time."

Stan flashed a smile that seemed a bit too big, "As the one with final say, I'm pleased to say that you're Ivy's new owner."

Jezebel bought me a new emerald green leash and collar set with sparkly red spots and, while putting it on me, whispered, "I hope you'll be happy in your forever home. Train him well and if he mistreats you, leave a message at the biggest tree near your new home, and an avenging angel will appear and neuter him."

So, under the all-seeing protection of my Seraph, I began a new life as Al's Tiarna and faithful companion.

End of Episode two



I mentioned charangos. Here’s a picture of mine: It’s a black and white image that was used a few years ago in this blog. The main difference between this and a Uke is the five double coursed strings, and the middle two are tuned to an octave like a twelve string guitar, the rest are unison or the sane note. Because it’s a native made instrument it’s difficult to play but it has a harp-like tone that similar instruments don’t have. I’ve played models that cost almost a thousand but always ended up sticking with this one. I’ll take more about in the next issue in late February.









SOME PREVIEWS OF MY VELLA BOOKS ON AMAZON:


The Boogie Underground Think Tank: How To Survive The End Of Civilization Update


 https://www.amazon.com/kindle-vella/story/B0BG6LNXTG


This one is a revival of an old humor column I ran in my old "Delta Snake Blues News" publication in the 90s and 2000s. The slant is about survival in the upcoming hard times, but it really will be topical and cover subjects that are offbeat but relevant. The next one coming in a few days will be "How To Shop For The Perfect Expert," which obviously will be a humorous commentary on the use of experts in general.


The ebook “On The Road With Al & Ivy: The Anthology Volume 1 2016-2018 is now on Kindle Unlimited!


Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!