Showing posts with label the quitters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the quitters. Show all posts

Saturday, March 19, 2022

On The Road With Al and Ivy: A Literary Homeless Chronicle - March 2022



"If she moves her eyes and opens her mouth just a little, the world she's trying to refuse will rush into her instantly..."

- Yukio Mishima (The Temple Of The Golden Pavilion, 1956)

The first historical example of free speech was in 200,000,000 B.C. which was documented on a Sumerian cuniform tablet unearthed during a Huntsville, Alabama Easter Egg hunt in 1978 by a child who unfortunately damaged the document by trying to eat the relic thinking it was a peanut butter chocolate egg. [Citation needed, some critics claim that the petrified fragment was actually a boiled Easter egg that was left in the field from the previous egg hunt in 1977]

The ancient excerpt, which an internet expert (who declines to identify himself) says is part of the first volume of the Lost Gospel of Murgatroyd, relates that the great King Nubilecanazzer McDougal the Glorious One, had just sentenced a peasant to several days of torture for unauthorized viewing of the Queen's royal buns (everyone just wore jewelery and yoga pants in those days) and the wag replied that said offense was impossible because the blinding light from such a shiny glutus blinded his wretched eyes.

This clever paradigm of free speech lasted about two minutes before the Monarch ordered a guard to cut the trailblazer's head off. The King's proclamation specified that any remarks the head might make while on display in the parking lot of the local supercenter were not subject to the King's approval. This was the first known example of protected speech as a matter of law.

...further evolution of free speech...

Internet scholar and Shitzu U Professor IvyDog noted that ancient tribes living in what is now the city of Chicago determined that it was probably better that any last words be spoken before execution, and to allow wide latitude over the subject matter, since any smartass remarks would be punished in the afterlife by the God's in a galaxy far away.

There's always been free speech. The question was how long the speaker would live afterwards, or if the point was worth the calories necessary to move the mouth muscles to form the words.

The Founding Fathers who created the U.S. Constitution kept the matter purely in the legal sphere, if for no other reason that it's virtually impossible to prevent societal suppression which ranges from angry mobs, gatekeepers, cancel culture, commissar types, or anyone offended enough to beat the crap out of the speaker. 

Think in terms of adolescent behavior and you'll get the picture. In the words of the great German theorist and war monger, Santaclausewitz Dill, "War is just a continuation of high school scheisse."

...the First Amendment...

The savvy Internet user knows the First Amendment was created to allow people to insult each other and express banalities that no one wants to hear in the hope that something profound or relevant might be expressed, though decades of web activity indicates that it's a long shot.

Indeed, free speech needs to be nurtured and protected, unlike butt kissing, compliments, flattery, arguing about football, lying on dating site profiles, deceptive sales pitches and claims of superhuman sexual prowess or spiritual divinity (particularly in the music industry) which historically have met with enthusiasm and acceptance.

The thing about the concept of free speech is that the letter of the law states that it's an absolute, but like the Gospel or the process of scientific discovery, mankind has added the innovation of the "spirit of the law" concept which allows such pure ideals to be riddled with loopholes, exceptions, abuse, and of course, anything that expedites the process of squeezing every last dollar from people.

In other words, you can say wherever you want, but you'll be punished for it by every legal and extralegal means possible. A person can publish a controversial book, for example, but others may ban it, burn it, give it an insulting one star review or heaven forbid, not buy it. Married couples and families say things to each other that would normally require trauma counselors in the public arena.

...just sayin'...

Actually, just talking will get you into trouble these days, particularly on the Internet which guarantees the right to punish free speech. American jurisprudence recognizes this and the Fifth Amendment protects the right to clam up and not say anything that might incriminate them. 

It goes without saying that it also means that others will assume guilt, put words in the uncooperative poltroon's mouth, concoct outrageous theories to explain the silence, and relentlessly try to badger and  intimidate them into speaking, and that's just sports talk radio and cable news; it gets even tougher in the real world.

Silence is often considered a sign of submission but if that was all there was to it, then despots wouldn't need secret police and informants. No fascist is truly happy until they control what's going on inside people's heads.

...a penny for your thoughts...

Suppressing free speech is generally about thought control, or as George Orwell put it in his essay, The Prevention Of Literature, "Even a single taboo can have an all-round crippling effect upon the mind, because there is always the danger that any thought which is freely followed up may lead to the forbidden thought."

Although the most common examples are religious or political; suppression of free speech and thought is also present in the social or artistic spheres. The desire to create unity or agreement often degenerates into conformity, coercion, peer pressure, and expensive vinyl record box sets.

Whether this or that group eats it's own or turns into a snake pit is irrelevant to most people (if they're consenting adults) but it's a issue for an artist doing a noncommissioned work. There's always a conflict between integrity and compromise.

Political oppression is or isn't a factor depending on what country you're talking about. In the U.S. an artist can get away with almost anything in the political sphere (in their melancholy search for controversy). Pressure generally comes from society or peers which can result in being shunned or a tendency to self-censor.

...perception...

That's as far as I'd go in commenting on the political aspect as, particularly in regards to the Internet, because the further one goes into the subject, the more it becomes about perception and context.

It's the same with maintaining artistic integrity in the face of market forces. The line between that pressure and the artist's ability to produce salable art can get pretty blurry. An artist can create a work that glorifies or advocates commiting a crime or socially unacceptable act, but any resulting controversy can't necessarily be characterized as an attack on free speech if the aim was to get people to fork over the cash.

A classic attack on free speech uses tactics or measures to prevent it in the first place. Once the idea is openly expressed any oppressor is half-beaten. That's why totalitarian forces use secret police and informants. They don't worry much about the public acts of defiance. As John Lennon once said, they know how to deal with open violence. The ideal solution is to ensure no one discusses freedom in private, where most revolutions are born.

In the artistic sphere, that means compelling artists to self-censor. Orwell describes the result as, "If he is forced to do so, the only result is his creative faculties will dry up."

...freedom of thought...

The underlying issue is freedom of thought. To quote Orwell again, "Freedom of the intellect means the freedom to report what one has seen, heard, and felt, and not be obliged to fabricate imaginary facts and feelings." [Note: Modern writers understand that exceptions include political speeches, rock star biographies, cable news, health food claims, and legitimate attempts to ruin someone's life by spreading vicious gossip on the Internet]

Intellectual or artistic freedom is very much about nuance and context, which are products of an artist's perception or intent and the details most often attacked in a controversial work of art.

...Temple Of The Golden Pavilion...

One good example is Yukio Mishima's "Temple Of The Golden Pavilion," which was based on a true incident that shocked Japan in the 50s. It's not so much an example of free thought as the product of it.

The novel is about a young Monk who inexplicably sets a fire that destroys the famous Kinkaku-ji temple, aka The Golden Pavilion in Kyoto in 1950. On the surface it appears to be a senseless act and the young Monk gives no explanation at first. His motive eventually comes out in interviews with the police, and Mishima researched the reportage and even talked with the young man in prison before writing the book.

The book is considered one of Mishima's finest, and is well documented on the web, so those who want to know all the details can research it using their favorite search engine. 

What's remarkable is that Mishima wrote the book entirely from the point of view of the young Monk, a true dispassionate account. As I've said in the past, that can be a rare kind of book. Particularly in the Internet era, that kind of nuance can be construed as sympathy or even tacit approval of a behavior or point of view.

Also, Mishima was a person who would have been controversial right now; a militant right wing Nationalist who wasn't "politically reliable" due to his artistic side, and thus found himself at various times criticized and attacked by both sides of the political spectrum.

...the temple...

Mishima writes long descriptive passages about the temple in the book, which makes sense as it became the young Monk's obsession, but he mixes in thoughts, commentary about the war (WW2), various interactions, and what can seem like off the wall details that subtly add more depth to the narrative. It's an early example of that Japanese form called an "essay novel," which combines historical narrative with story details so that by the end, you've have the backstory but also a feel for the Monk's personality.

The young arsonist in real life was a schizophrenic, but Mishima doesn't use that label or include medical details about that mental illness. Explaining the technical details in the narrative is something a modern writer might do, but here it's all about what's going on inside the character's head.

That's a subtle distinction but an important one. The young accolyte obsesses on details that most would consider petty or strange, and the author follows those trains of thought and behavior, making no attempt to rationalize any of it or offer any explanation. It takes discipline and a willingness to trust the reader and to resist the temptation to explain or judge to avoid having people think that it's really the writer's thoughts or to showcase how thorough the research was.

...the nurse...

One central incident is the Monk's hatred for a young nurse he hardly knows, and the conviction that his will caused her later death. In actual fact, there was virtually no connection, but in his mind, there was an obsessively detailed narrative that's more chilling than any clinical description a psychiatrist or expert could give.

In other words, an author can explain that this or that obsession is dangerous or venal, or a movie can show the emotion or violence, but not the kind of insight one can get from seeing the actual thought process or inner dialogue.

Mishima understood one aspect of obsession, which was every detail has the same weight or effect. One very small encounter with the nurse turned into a significant incident that became part of the narrative of the imagined relationship. Later on, though he was only a distant observer of her death, it felt as personal as if he'd done the deed himself.

Mishima wrote this book in an era where there was less incentive to make it more marketable by sensationalizing the weird details, so the build up towards the final obsession that compelled an act of arson on a national treasure has a twisted and detailed logic. It was the culimation of a lifetime of perceived slights and injustices.

...reads like poetry...

Another aspect of Mishima's style was that many of the passages are poetic, at least in the Japanese sense of the word. There's lots of interesting imagery, described in a spare, zen-like style, and digressions that fans of Marcel Proust or James Joyce would be familiar with.

The Temple Of The Golden Pavilion by Yukio Mishima was one of the best psychological novels of it's time and is still highly regarded now. The passages that combine stream of consciousness, historical events, and action are worth reading by anyone who studies the art of writing.

Mishima was a man who blew hot and cold and his own life was a series of spectacular successes and failures, but he could put that all aside and put himself into the mind of another and tell that monk's story. Perhaps that was possible because he saw something of himself in the extremes of that young man's personality, but the compelling story that resulted showed that above all else, Mishima was an artist. 

That's probably why, as Orwell would have said, he was politically unreliable, but that's also why the art he created was so great.


Now live on Kindle Unlimited 















...March update on The Quitters...

I'm well into the third month of "The Quitters" and while it's had it's ups and downs, it's been a great experience. I enjoy writing, so how could it not be? 

The Amazon bonus system on Vella was a pleasant surprise. I'd keep writing even the readership was nonexistent, but it's still nice that the book is generating income on top of the royalties.

The promo has evolved from pics to music videos/book trailers. I have a sizable amount of instrumental music on the Electric Fog Factory YouTube site so these videos combine my two main projects. It's quadrupled the traffic to the music site so it's working out well. 

Those who've seen the video have noticed that the music is eclectic and that the "theme song" that's played during the last part where the book info is shown sounds more New Wave or Alternative. Which is sort of true, but the cut, "Rug Becomes Sky" is very much in the mold of one of the legendary First Wave bands, Television. 



Music Video Book Trailers one and two for "The Quitters" by Al Handa, a Serial Novel on Kindle Vella. Both 1&2 now on YouTube! Features 60s rock, #EDM #Dub, rockabilly, psychedelic, acid jazz and #punk music from DJ Boogie Underground, Mark McGraw and Handa-McGraw International on YouTube. 



...punk in 1977...

Punk in 1977 was diverse, and hadn't narrowed into the hardcore image that many have of it today. In fact, it was so varied that even Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers were initially identified as a punk band. In other words, it was difficult to put a label on it, though the press focused on the Sex Pistols and the leather crowd.

But, it was all good. Some of my favorite bands of all time came out of that first wave, like Television (and the solo work of Tom Verlaine), XTC, Wire, Ramones, Sex Pistols, Clash, Buzzcocks, Chris Spedding, Siouxie, Eddie and the Hot Rods, Nick Lowe, Blondie, Patti Smith, and Talking Heads. Add in the ones I didn't name and you have a wide variety of styles and sounds.

...coming in April...

April will be a big month for the book, as the exposition phase is almost done, so I can move the various story arcs into meatier subjects like music industry corruption, payola, rock press, myth making and good old boy sexism. That's an important point as myth often becomes popular history.

The time period of this book encompasses the early days of feminism and the sexism females experienced in the music world (which was nothing new). The punk mythos was that more female bands and stars emerged than in rock, which was true, though nowhere near the number Top-40 produced.

Most of the opportunities for females in the music industry were in classical, popular or Top-40. It doesn't need to be argued that rock and roll was a boy's club. Just look at the existing documentation and music charts. The small number of exceptions only make it more obvious.

...women and opportunity...

Women did find more opportunity in the early punk movement, and if able to find their own sound and move past the hardcore punk genre, found great success in the more mainstream categories like New Wave, power pop, alternative, etc, particularly with the rise of MTV which helped them bypass the normal channels in the industry.

Feminism in the 70s was just past the "bra burning" stage and still finding it's way. Even liberal males resisted the movement though perhaps willing to pay lip service to the concept of equality. There were exceptions but none that showed that sexism didn't exist. My book won't be a definitive look at the movement, which is better documented elsewhere, but it was a factor so it's addressed in the book.

It was never my intent to write another fluff tale (like the Buddy Holly Story movie) so the episodes coming in April should make for interesting reading and on my end, enjoyable and rewarding to write.



Chapter Overview With Samples:

With eight chapters live, those who've read the book can see that the various plot and character arcs are starting to really develop. The first three chapters, which describes an audition gig in real time, has bits and pieces along with the action passages that begin to flesh out the personalities involved.

As you can tell from the chapter titles, this isn't going to be a mythological bad boy punk story where everyone wears ripped t-shirts. If for no other reason, SF Punk wasn't like the press photos and canned interviews. There was a definite intellectual or anti-intellectual atmosphere in the scene, and plenty of tongue-in-cheek talk. There's a definite strain of black humor (and slapstick) in the proceedings. You really had to have a sense of humor in that scene.

Also, how Nym's personality and musical skill develops is important later when the scene shifts to Southern California, with it's considerably larger and more diverse music scene.

Chapter 3 and 4 are a break from the fast paced action, and gives the reader a glimpse of Nym's world, of the motivations and aspirations, introduces a new character, and creates a more complex picture of Jesus Guy, who comes off a really weird dude in the earlier chapters.

The idea is to give the free chapters more substance, and insert a new one that I was going to write later, but decided needed to be earlier in the story. Most readers who visit Vella will get 200 free tokens, so the changes don't affect my chapter plan. That many tokens will get you through most of the book.

The new Chapter 3 will follow Nym after the gig. This will give the reader more insight into Nym's personality. This new chapter will be live around Feb. 17th or sooner if it's completed before then.

Chapters 5 and 6 pick up the pace, though each features more character development. Both Ross and Stew show flamboyant public personas which turn out to be more interesting and detailed in Chapter 8. 

Chapter 7 focuses on Marly, the promoter who's infamous for his tough comedy routine to clear the Club before closing. As you go deeper into the book, it'll become obvious that a large part of the Punk scene is part of his long range plan that mostly succeeds, but also has the seeds of future discord and division.

Chapter 8 is a personal favorite (along with 4 and 6), as it gives me a chance to put many of the characters in one place and able to talk casually. There's a hint of future controversy that'll create a lot of turmoil in the later chapters.

The chapter 9 excerpt is from an episode that isn't completed yet, but Nym's personality is fleshed out further, both in inner dialogue and as seen by a couple of other characters.

...Chapter Excerpts...

Chapter 4: Nym’s Cool World

"It's a crisp August evening in the sin section of Broadway Street. The summer crowds are gone, and the sound of cars and busses are replaced by the shrill, desperate pitches of strip joint barkers now fishing in depleted waters.

Night is the best time, there's less detail, and the world’s simpler. It's easier to be me, enjoying the feeling of knowing I’m coming back to play again.

I’m skipping the third band, and just workin' on my Punk 'tude outside the pinball parlor next door. I'm puffing on a French cig, which adds cool and helps me resist the rich smell of Phillipino food from the restaurant section of the club. My macaroni and cheese dinner with a coke chaser is starting to wear off."

Chapter 5: The Negatives: A Punk Action Movie In Real Life

"The crowd’s colliding like bumper cars, so Ross jumps and twists in the air, giving the tourists a picture of wild, chaotic energy. 

It's like a modern art painting in motion! The Negatives' show has something for everyone! 

I'll have to ask Ross how he manages to get so much of his tongue hanging out like that. Whenever I try, I start gagging.

The fourth song, "Planet Toe Jam" is slower, which cools down the slam dancing. They want the crowd to just stand there, which sets up what's coming next. Plus in a longer set, it helps to have a romantic number so people can slow dance if they want to."

Chapter 6: Herman Hesse's Glass Bead Game - The Punk Version

"I gotta say he looks the part of a great artist; a big burly skinhead type who named his band after a Hermann Hesse novel. He says names like "Steely Dan" from Burroughs' "Naked Lunch," are too New York for his taste. Besides, being named after a dildo is so 60s!

I took Ida to see his show last month, and after she calmed down and agreed to not press charges, described the act as "Butt Love horseplay masquerading as performance art. It's definitely not entertainment."

I told Stew what she said, and he had the comment added to the group's press kit and asked me to thank her for the great review!"

Chapter 7: Marly Tells A Punk Bedtime Story

"Marly cuts the horn, then freezes like a brave knight who's just slain a dragon, which seems odd until I realize that some tourists are taking pictures. 

I subtly turn so my left side faces the cameras and pout at the ceiling. I take the goolie out of my mouth and hold it with two fingers near my chin, so the smoke curls near my face. Keeping it in your mouth makes you look like a puppy chewing on a biscuit, not very punk."

Chapter 8: Celebration At The Pup Chuck Wagon 24 Hour Hot Dog Diner

"There's no better place for a rising star to bask in new found glory than Pup Chuck Wagon, the 24 hour hot dog diner, a haven for San Franciscans who have more coolness than cash. Cheap food and everything you sit or eat on is washable!

I can afford a mustard dog, small fries and coffee if I use my bus money. It's only a half hour walk home and this night of achievement calls for a feast!"

Chapter 9: Nym's Walk Home

"How did you know I spent my bus fare?"

Jesus guy sighs, "You passed a bus stop on Stockton without stopping, I'd have given you the fare but Phil came, so I just took the next bus."

"You assumed Phil would give me fare money?"

"I ordained it, it's what I do child, besides, I can't go giving you cash every time you go broke, my wallet would be so light it'd float me back into Heaven and I'd have to do the Resurrection all over again."





The Al & Ivy Homeless Literary Journal Archive:

There are earlier blog entries on the Delta Snake Review section of this site that aren't on the On The Road page:
http://deltasnake.blogspot.com





Cover Reveal For Hide In Plain Sight


This is the cover for the upcoming book, Hide In Plain Sight, hopefully out sometime in 2022.




The American Primitive Acoustic Collection by Handa-McGraw International can be streamed on all of the major services, including Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, and dozens of others. Note: only available on YouTube until April 21st



The Music Of Handa-McGraw International can also be heard on the Electric Fog Factory on YouTube. You can hear the album, and dozens of unreleased cuts and demos, plus exclusive video of Ivy.























 

Tuesday, January 4, 2022

On The Road With Al And Ivy: A Literary Homeless Chronicle - Jan. 4th, 2022



"With an old and tried swordsman like myself, knowledge of the use of his weapon is everything; but with a young Hotspur of your temper, strength and energy go for much."

- Arthur Conan Doyle (Micah Clarke)

Internet experts state that in the early prehistoric days of mankind, when men were men, and women could have as many boyfriends as they felt like having, climate change created an extinction event that wiped out all of the man eating dinosaurs and saber tooth tigers, who in their hungry heyday made sure that no human being lived longer than, say, ten years. This removed one of the biggest reasons that cavemen and cavewomen didn’t last very long; leaving only disease, starvation, minor injuries, warfare, and marriage.

The longer life spans created new social phenomena, such as villages, condos, Kings and Emperors, celebrities famous for being famous, organized warfare, government, poor people, and of course, reality shows.

 However, the most pervasive sociological innovation was the “Generation Gap,” as it was called in the 60s. The first recorded instance of the younger generation pissing off their parents and calling them old farts was in Ancient Greece, the first civilization that had an alphabet that didn’t consist of pictures of animals and Gods. 

...the earliest travel blogger...

As recorded in a fragment of Book 13, Page 2, paragraph 10, of the ancient Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyd discovered in the recycle bin of a Chicago Hair Salon, the legendary Greek travel blogger, Herodotus O'Grady, describes an inscription on a newly manufactured vase that reads, “Achilles, Eiste ena palio fart," which was later unearthed in 1994 by an Ebay seller who found it at an flea market sale in Raleigh, North Carolina. 

Some Internet experts claim that the purported vintage Greek vase is actually a bottle of pressed virgin olive oil bottled in New Jersey in 2010, and of dubious quality, but as we all know, Ebay has strict measures in place to prevent the sale of fraudulent items, so the claims of the seller can be taken at face value. [citation needed, please define "at face value"]

...the generation gap...

The Generation Gap has certain aspects that haven’t changed throughout mankind’s history, and the most egalitarian is that everyone gets to be the vivacious, know it all whippersnappers who are sneered at by the cynical, beaten down by life old farts who bridle when their achievements aren’t treated on the same level as Taylor Swift winning a Grammy. 

Then in few years, longer if the older generation tries to extend adolescence with cosmetic surgery and asserting that 50 is the new 20, the young snots are confronted by a new crop of sass mouth delinquents who can eat junk food and not gain weight, and aren’t aware that the Beatles were the greatest thing since sliced bread and adult diapers.

This generational conflict was, at one time, muted by social controls such as teaching respect for elders to young minds not yet able to produce audible cuss words, corporal punishment, making kids stand in corners or bedrooms without supper, cutting allowances, and Lifetime Movies, but history has proven that it’s a losing battle, and time is on the side of the pups that gradually become aware of their awesome power and love for death metal music. Commercial advertisers, who follow the more sensible outlook of money grubbing, know all this, and focus on the younger demographic.

 ...childhood's end...

This blogger is aware that childhood and adolescence is a time for discovery, wonder, sexual awakening, and the assumption of greater responsibilities in an ever changing world, but that’s all been beaten to death by Hollywood and the media, and is boring even to the young target audience that now prefers the joys of making millions on social media, eating various chemicals in Tik Tok challenges, anonymous Internet trolling, and cancelling artists for the slightest reason. 

Though in all fairness, this sort of thing has been going on since the Ancient Greeks wiped out the city of Troy just because someone stole a King’s wife. If Achilles, the big stud warrior of the Trojan War, had paid more attention to his brand, we’d be seeing his face on cereal boxes. Todays young heroes are much more saavy.

 ...Jack London and Tom Wolfe...

Two definitive stories about the Generation Gap, besides my latest Punk Rock satire, "The Quitters" (retitled from the original Electric Fog Factory, see the included first chapter later in this blog entry), is Jack London’s classic “A Piece Of Steak,” which covers the concept from a Darwinian perspective, and Tom Wolfe’s “Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test,” which has a more sociological angle, and is one of the definitive studies of the formative years of the Baby Boomer generation.

These works delineate the two classic points of view in any generational type story; the older viewpoint of experience and wisdom, and the younger theme of discovery and exploration.

...a piece of steak...

Jack London’s short story, published in the Saturday Evening Post in 1909, is about an aging boxer named Tom King, who in his younger days had been a dominant fighter, flush with cash that was spent as soon as it was earned. The scene opens with Tom eating a humble meal of bread and gravy, that his wife had to borrow the flour for, and who sits by and watches, as there's only enough for one. The two children have been sent to bed early in the hopes that they wouldn't notice that dinner was being skipped.

The scene isn’t as dire as it might seem, as Tom has been given the opportunity to fight in a winner take all match, with a prize of 30 quid, which would change his fortunes for the better. That sparse meal is a final effort by the family to send him off in the best condition possible, though he still feels hungry afterwards. He grumbles that even a single piece of steak would make a huge difference. A passage about trying to pretend that his pipe has tobacco adds to the picture of destitution.

London, as usual, does a good job of creating a vivid picture of the fighter’s inner thoughts as he heads for the match, mixing seamlessly with the details of a once vibrant life and career. The account of Tom's struggle to defeat the younger boxer is textbook live action narrative, a superb piece of writing.

Like many of London’s stories, it’s about how age slows down the vitality of youth, and evolves into guile and skill gained from experience. However, London’s message is consistent, you can slow down Father Time, but in the end, you’ll always lose.

 ...acid test...

Tom Wolfe's book, "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test," about Ken Kesey and his Pranksters, has a youthful outlook, that of exploration and rebellion, though it's a complex, detailed chronicle of the rise and fall of a movement. I've discussed this book in an earlier blog, but here will focus on a different aspect of the story.

The tale isn't just about a generation gap, one could say that Ken Kesey's aim was to build a new society based on the widespread use of acid to, for lack of a better term, free people's minds.

In fact, one of the purposes of the "Acid Tests" was, as one of the leaders put it, to learn "how to function on acid." As history has shown, the end result was psychedelic style rock concerts, complete with light shows to simulate the acid trip experience and of course, make a lot of money, which is the American Way.

...intentions..

Kesey's intention wasn't to create a new class of millionaires in the entertainment industry. Tom Wolfe said, in a later interview, that Kesey's (and his followers) early experience with acid created an ecstacy type experience that was common to new religions, though perhaps a better term is revelation or paradigm.

Kesey's group, The Merry Pranksters, did make a sincere attempt to create a new, freer society based on a sort of nonauthority, where the leaders suggested rather than gave orders (much like most Native American tribes).

The movement was bankrolled by Kesey, who used the royalties from his book, One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, so most of the problems in creating a new society, like food production and other such things weren't a factor. Everyone just followed his lead and embarked on a series of journeys and spiritual exercises, albeit with a lot of partying, sex, and the occasional hazing of squares and other unhip types. In the end, the whole trip did end up depending on one leader, whose rise and fall determined the fate of the Pranksters.

I'm oversimplifying, of course, the interpretation of the events can range from cynical to florid romanticism, and Wolfe masterfully navigates a middle course in his book.

...opinion...

My opinion is that Kesey was on to something, but it takes a lot of moral courage to reject the system and to live outside of it. Basically his followers eventually chose safer courses and built a society based on an outward change in appearances but followed the time honored Western principles of structure, commerce and heirarchy.

Another way to put it was that Kesey was heading in a metaphysical direction and was willing to make mistakes or explore what could be dead ends for the sake of enlightenment, which someone from an Eastern culture would understand, but not a Westerner used to leaders who at least behave like infallible winners of the game.

The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test by Tom Wolfe is an examination of a youthful, if not young, attempt to supplant an older system, which one could say was a partial victory that created some change but in the end was as far from the original conception as the Catholic Church was from what Jesus preached. 

Both works are worth reading for more than that idea. Both have passages that would be considered politically incorrect now, but any perspective from a writer who has the ability to stand outside of the box and describe what's going on inside is worth reading and learning from.


Now live on Kindle Unlimited 






Now live on Kindle Unlimited 













The American Primitive Acoustic Collection by Handa-McGraw International can be streamed on all of the major services, including Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, and dozens of others.



The Music Of Handa-McGraw International can also be heard on the Electric Fog Factory on YouTube. You can hear the album, and dozens of unreleased cuts and demos, plus exclusive video of Ivy.



Tuesday, December 7, 2021

On The Road With Al and Ivy: A Literary Homeless Chronicle - Dec. 2021




"You may well ask me such things, that to some I shall answer truly, and to others I shall not." And she added, "If you were well informed about me, you would wish me to be out of your hands. I have done nothing except by revelation."

- Jeanne D'Arc (The Trial of Jeanne D'Arc, trans. by W.P. Barrett)

The historical origins of music aren't clear. However, the internet, which is never at a loss for words, provides a wealth of competing theories, which as a matter of fairness, will be listed without comment, though I'll omit the purported dates so we won't have to remember anything.

The various wellsprings of song include:

Lyre accompaniment to Greek poetry recitals, accompaniment to seasonal and fertility rites, celebrating a successful harvest, bird songs that inspired the Flintstones and Barney Rubble to explore their inner fem, tribal drummers playing long boring solos so people started adding vocals, aliens giving ancient Egyptians another nudge towards higher civilization after Cleopatra complained that the pyramids could be built by any peasant with Legos, artists trying to make money without working in fields or factories (the quest continues to this day), marching bands needing gigs in between wars of conquest, promoters trying to spice up monotonous gladiator shows, Johann Sebastian Bach needing something to do when not having sex with every woman that came within 10 feet of him, desperate attempts to make mimes less irritating by adding soundtrack music, trying to inspire people to buy more stuff for Christmas, and the release of the Beatles Sgt. Pepper album. [citation needed, some experts claim that modern music started with the release of Lady Gaga's Born This Way single]

...the dawn of professional musicians...

The search for the origins of professional music isn't so elusive. It dates back to the early period when people began to congregate into villages similar to modern day social networks like Facebook and Twitter, with the resulting array of social behavior ranging from a global love of cats to the intense hatred of people one hardly knows, and of course the practice of "unfriending," though back then it was called exile, banishment, or witch trials. 

The earliest known reference to musicians who no longer performed useful daily tasks, such as food production, defense of the village, or crafting implements, appears to come from Sumerian clay cuneiform fragments that experts estimate were written around 234,456 B.C. and are from the second chapter of The Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyd, page ten, paragraph 14, and translated by the Shitzu U scholar Ivy Shitz in 1946, which reads:
 
"I travers'd the iniquities of the world during harvest,
I lay in sweet repose, hidden from dutys of the plow,
 to find succor in bless'd sleep and escape
the devilish rancor of fellows resenting mine sloth,
and in dream comes heav'nly visions of undiminisht light,
severe in lustre, full of bestial harlots, casual in vertue,
with wanton amours, rivers of Mead,
and wings to fly from all werk,
to enjoy the love of a fawn'g mosh pit multitude.
Then the guiltie Serpent appears, and so sayeth,
to sate thy rockn'rola appetites, becometh a musician,
and be deliver'd from judgement, whether in Heav'n or Hell,
and attain the ease thee seeks."
 
It should be noted that some Internet sleuths claim that the verses appear to be a clumsy transposition of Middle English with phrases inaccurately lifted from texts by Bunyan and Milton, and furthermore, the clay fragments appear to be actually part of a broken Hello Kitty ashtray that was discovered in the clearance section of a Chicago dollar store, and the date on the price tag indicates the date of manufacture is 1982. Said experts add that the purported cuneiforms are just brush texture marks from a cheap paint job intended to keep the price of the item at a dollar.
 
Since we're all familiar with the inaccuracy of internet data, these so-called corrections can be dismissed as fake news, and the transcription can be assumed to be as accurate as a modern day bio of a rock star or Hollywood actor, well within Internet standards of veracity.

...godfathers of punk...
 
It was probably around this time that Godfathers of Punk appeared, though most Internet accounts vary depending on which Record Label press release is the source document. Because of the vast and confusing body of data on the subject, it’s best to leave the subject a matter of personal conviction between each person and their streaming playlists.
 
…before we go into the history of punk rock…
 
In attempting to present the reader with an accurate history of a music genre, we have to address the fact that artists will say anything to get people to buy albums.The temptation to lie like a dog isn't exclusively a musical vice. Politicians routinely issue outrageous statements with no appearance of embarrassment or shame, and certainly in America, such elastic standards of truth are considered justified if the goal is to get super rich. 

As such, I'll assume all musical sources are true unless proven otherwise. Also, I won't bother with dates or names so no one has to remember anything.
 
The music industry never made any secret of the fact that they were in the entertainment business until the 60s, when the young rebels of rock and roll rejected the shallow values of money grubbing, reliance on top 40 singles, embraced the importance of relevance and social consciousness, and explored the deeper artistic aims and profit margins that could be achieved through the broader canvas of the long playing album.
 
The major labels were certainly taken aback at first, but came to Jesus very quickly; after all, the higher markup on albums made revolution, peace, and love a win-win for all, and figured that once these rebellious crusaders became rich, they'd see the light and get serious about extracting every possible revenue stream from their adoring fans.
 
Which is how it pretty much stayed through the CD era, as artists and labels kept prices up by increasing the content of new releases to 50-60 minutes, even if that meant consumers had to buy the whole package to get the song or songs they actually wanted. Sure, singles were still released, but were priced well above that of old school 45s.

...the turning point...
 
The turning point in the United States was the development of what was known as the “concept album,” which in theory meant the songs were part of some really deep theme, man, or in the case of one famous example, The Who’s “Tommy,” told a story that had a lot of deep meaning and significance. Like with Tommy, the story could be so awesome that it was necessary to issue the work as a double album, which not only allowed the plot to fully develop, but increased the take. Like sand in a bikini bottom, art and business always finds a way.
 
That was when the United States and England began to diverge (again); while the Yanks moved towards albums, the British artists, as a general rule, still thought in terms of releasing singles first for an audience that wanted the songs heard on the radio, then following up with albums. Even progressive rock groups, who specialized in long, complicated songs, made sure to release airplay friendly singles.
 
The point was, you released 45s to get airplay, and made your money doing live performances. Of course, it’s more complicated than that, but good enough for the purposes of this blog entry.
 
…singles and LPs…

That’s why punk rock developed differently than in America, and without the English rockers, the music could have just ended up being a cult or critic’s band type genre. There, most of the radio airplay, which was critical to success, centered on the BBC and pirate stations. That made it easier to break one’s music, and all a band needed was a single (or even a tape with the pirate stations). I’m simplifying, of course, but across the Atlantic pond, a band or artist didn’t necessarily need to record an album or even get signed to get attention from the music media.
 
In other words, the British music culture never abandoned the single, which in America had receded in influence during the 60s. That’s an important difference, because how the punk genre developed in England influenced it’s American counterpart.
 
Singles were always the primary form of promo, and given the most studio time. A group might spend a couple of hours recording the single, and be given just one more to record the rest of the album. The single, at least the "A Side," represented the artist's best effort to sell music to the public. American groups in the 60s eventually started recording albums first, then selecting cuts from it to be singles. This practice would be reinforced by Rock mags that'd mainly review the LPs as a unit, unlike English pubs that would have celebrities commenting on the latest singles as well.
 
 In England, even groups like the Beatles would release singles first, then later include those on an album, or in the case of songs like "Rain," or "Hey Jude," those would end up on a later compilation album. Singles  would often be left off of a U.K. album because it was seen as making the public pay for the song twice. There's a lot of other reasons and exceptions, of course, but as a generality, that's basically how the two cultures approached singles.
 
…the beauty…
 
The beauty of a single is that the consumer generally knows it from radio airplay, wants the song and can buy it. The lower cost also encourages people to take a chance on a new group. Until the advent of streaming, the main choice the labels offered was to buy a set of songs, most unheard, and unlike most other products, there was no money back guarantee. In the CD era, new releases were almost always near the one hour range to keep the price up, which taxed the abilities of more than one group to fill with killer cuts. Most consumers have experienced the joy of buying an album and only liking some of the cuts, but as with products like phone-based customer service and autocorrect, the consumer has learned to eat poop and like it.
 
There were always singles, of course, but the CD versions were more expensive than vinyl 45s, and never really caught on. Labels (and artists with big expenses) had no incentive to give consumers just the songs they wanted. Which, incidentally, is the reason why the industry hated cassette decks that could tape songs off the radio. Most consumers won't buy albums if they can get the actual song they want (for free or otherwise).
 
…indies…
 
Indie artists have always put out albums, of course, but after going through the expense and labor of putting one out, they ran into the dirty little secret of the music business, and the major labels had the same problem, which was that distributors hold most of the power, both in distribution and payment. More than one indie label in the 50s and 60s went under when the distributor screwed them out of their money.
 
That's why Walmart, the biggest retail seller, can require an otherwise rebellious artist to put out a PG rated version of an album (in America, revolution is all about saying a lot of dirty words). You can be a rebel, if you don't mind losing millions in sales. Most end up choosing compromise, which is the American Way, and most fans will understand the deep angst involved. [citation needed on the last sentence, I'm just assuming consumers think like Record execs and millionaire artists]



…very early punk…
 
By the late 70s, a new band in the US that wanted to make the big time faced many obstacles besides fighting oppression by The Man and achieving world peace. There was the expense of "pro level" instruments and equipment, and being told that labels required quality demos that could cost thousands of dollars to record. Then the tape was submitted to the labels, who would only choose a few from the thousands submitted. If you were lucky, one of the label A&R men might discover you, but most had to submit demos.
 
If you got signed, your advance was generally a loan against royalties, and if the record flopped (or didn't make the money back), as most did, then you either played what they told you to try and make the money back, or they owned your publishing.
 
…you can make it…
 
An artist could break through on a regional level, mainly through live performance, but their ability to make money from recording was limited by the ferociously corrupt music media and of course, being at the mercy of distributors who might not even bother to pick up a product that wouldn't sell the minimum number of copies required to make the kind of profit that was considered worth the trouble.
 
There was one exception, where a new sound or culture would arise in some city or region that the industry couldn't ignore, like the psychedelic bands in San Francisco, or the beat groups in England, but that wasn't always a given. A scene in Boston got a lot of hype in the 60s, for example, but not much came of it.
 
Keep in mind, I'm moving very quickly. For a deeper understanding of music history, a search on Google can unearth a lot of interesting and fun detail to flesh out my narrative or confirm my ignorance. Either way, please follow your heart, or whatever your spirit animal tells you to do.
 
…Back to England...
 
Just before the English Punk explosion in the 70s, there was a popular club level music called Pub Rock, which was essentially sped up R&B and 60s rock, which spawned groups such as Dr. Feelgood and Brinsley Schwartz, and was headed in the same direction of the NYC scene that featured groups like the Ramones and Patti Smith, that is to say, cult status fortified by support by friends who were mostly Rock critics.
 
However, two things happened, both in England and in America.
 
The Pub Rock movement became a scene where many of the future punk stars got their start. One example was Joe Strummer, a founding member of the Clash who was in a group called the "101'ers" and another being Nick Lowe who was a member of Brindley Schwartz, who became a solo artist and producer for the influential Stiff label (Elvis Costello, etc).
 
In the states, an English manager/promoter named Malcom McLaren had failed to make a group called the New York Dolls into big stars, and went back to England and tried again with a group called The Sex Pistols. From this point on, the events are historical and well documented on the internet and worth further study. I could delineate it all here, but I do need to start getting to the actual point of this essay. My duty to truth demands it.
 
…getting the breaks…
 
What broke punk wide open wasn't massive record sales, but the Sex Pistols managing to capture both the imagination of a subculture of young people looking for something new, and generating an epic amount of negative publicity that, as usual in such cases, had the effect of raising their profile to the international level. That made people talk about punk, and even the mainstream media began looking around for punk bands to cover.
 
The crowning glories were that their single, Anarchy In The U.K., was banned from the BBC, and causing an national uproar when they responded to an interviewer's challenge to say obscenities on TV and thus finding it almost impossible to find places to play in the ensuing uproar. Which of course had the effect of putting punk on the map. Not many artists can say that a whole country hated their guts, though a great many try to achieve that (though not too hard of course, just enough to sell records).
 
The Pistols had one other big effect on the scene; the audiences that came to the early Sex Pistol gigs included fans like Joe Strummer and Billy Idol, and bands like the Buzzcocks were formed by those fans who often hadn’t played in a band before or could even play instruments. It was a similar situation to the early 60s rock scene there.
 
…basic currency…
 
The currency of punk was the single. Groups that the industry wouldn't touch put out singles which were eagerly played on the pirate stations there.The basic aesthetic was; if you wanted to play, then form a band and just do it. Put out a single if you were capable of creating a song, don't wait till some label found you. That resulted in the recording of a lot of music that varied in quality, much like today’s digital age, but the lack of gatekeepers and perceived expense made the music game accessible to a lot of young people, who took advantage.
 
The emphasis on live performance also gave fans an on opportunity to see bands up close, which wasn't unique of course, but in America, music had evolved too much into American Dream territory, to make it big and play big gigs for lots of money. It was all about stars and audiences buying albums and watching them in big halls and stadiums (or in disco, dispensing with musicians and just playing records).
 
It goes without saying that punk eventually ended up there too, but young people really do prefer to see and hear music from their own generation, so each wave has to rise and fall so the next get their turn.
That's a very broad stroke, but essentially the truth. Like I said in the October blog, if it wasn't punk, it'd have been something else.
 
The whole punk thing created an opening for a new generation of musicians, and that's why the Pistols are such a big symbol in the upcoming serial novel. Musicians have played in clubs and bars forever, but only at certain times did they feel that it was part of something bigger and could play their own songs and music.
 
…other examples…
 
Other periods that were similar included early Delta Blues, 50s Chicago Blues and Rock and roll, Doo-Wop, Early Rap, Bop, and free jazz, to name a few. Artists that were playing something new, and important enough that the money wasn't always the point. It was something they loved enough to do for free, which was often necessary because of the often low or non-existent pay they had to accept to play.
 
Many of the people reading this blog will understand that sensibility; writing indie books, doing crafts, hobbies, or playing/recording music has to be from love as the financial rewards aren't often there. Most of the bands who played punk didn't earn much, but got the chance to feel like part of something bigger, and like the feeling an indie author gets when he or she publishes a book, there's a feeling that they've beaten the odds and did something not everybody could do.
 
That was Punk's biggest contribution; it helped reset the cycle (in rock) and made the starting line open to anybody again. In the pre-digital era, that was no small thing.
 
…important and influential punk artists and groups…
 
As far as a list of important punk artists, that’s something the reader can find in abundance on the internet. The lists can vary, depending on the compiler’s tastes, or agenda, but most are sources of many hours of rewarding exploration, listening pleasure, argument, and judgements as to the level of intelligence or taste in other cretins and philistines who don't get it.
 
What I can do, though, is list the groups that were important to me and other punk rockers at the time. What was heard in the Mabuhay, both on stage and over the PA system during breaks, and talked about by artists there were often different than described in articles about the music.
 
For example, the San Francisco rock scene that started in the 60s was still vibrant in 1977, yet the Mabuhay never played anything by the Jefferson Airplane or other psychedelic groups. There were writers at the time that asserted that many of those now legendary groups were Godfathers of Punk, but in reality, it was sort of true, and sort of not.

...record collection...
 
As an avid record collector, for example, I had every Airplane, Hot Tuna, and Grateful Dead album, but had no desire to hear that stuff in the club, or even thought of them as musical heroes or influences there. The names that meant something included The Sex Pistols, Clash, Wire, Generation X, Ramones, Patti Smith, Television, Iggy Pop, The Stooges, to name a few, and in terms of 60s groups, one heard talk about the Kinks, Stones or even Captain Beefheart rather than the Beatles or Beach Boys.
 
There wasn’t a consensus either; there were punk artists that thought this or that group was “too pop,” and most of the mainstream attempts to incorporate punk were laughed at, particularly the ones who did it to prove they were the original punks. I won’t name examples of the latter, but will quote Lenny Bruce who said, “there’s nothing sadder than an aging hipster.”

- Al Handa


Now live on Kindle Unlimited 






Now live on Kindle Unlimited 








The Al & Ivy Homeless Literary Journal Archive:

There are earlier blog entries on the Delta Snake Review section of this site that aren't on the On The Road page:
http://deltasnake.blogspot.com





-Al Handa



The American Primitive Acoustic Collection by Handa-McGraw International can be streamed on all of the major services, including Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, and dozens of others.