Showing posts with label homeless. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homeless. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

On The Road With Al And Ivy: A Literary Homeless Chronicle - Oct. 2022



“She is herself like an angel in revolt. On the judgment of these men, whose eyes are constantly on their superiors or staring at the floor, Jeanne expiates the crime of plain-speaking and of looking straight into the eyes of her adversaries.”

- The Trial Of Jeanne D’Arc (W.P. Barrett translation from the original Latin and French documents)

The origins of legends about witches and black cats were shrouded in mystery until 123,456 A.D. when the late Professor Ivy Of 'Shitzu U' began groundbreaking studies which unearthed heretofore suppressed Gospels from the early days of Christianity, known today by historians as "The Bro Club Age Of Enlightenment." 

"It was difficult to ascertain from historical accounts exactly when witches and black cats became besties, much less if women even existed," the Fluffy White Martyr For The Sacred Feminine stated in her 1986 book, Black Cats Are A-Holes, "Ancient historical accounts rarely mention females unless a famous dude became embroiled in a divorce, which was forbidden until Pope Grouchy McAllister III of the now defunct Middle Finger At Satan Church issued a Papal Edict in 12345 A.D. that stated, 'Divorce is now allowed as long as the sinful Jezebel is excommunicated beforehand and proper payment to the Pontiff made.'"

Imagine the shock the Good Professor experienced when discovering that witches had existed long before that term became common!

It was found that in the early dawn of the written word, in the ancient Egyptian chronicle, "To Jest Fikcja," the word to describe a female who was beautiful, smart, sassy, cute, and didn't put up with any man's shit, who naturally was Queen Khleopahtra, was accidentally changed from the "B Word" to the word "witch" by the autocorrect software at the time and the substitution of the letter W for B went unnoticed by male editors too busy looking at porn sites.

The Waggy Tailed Student Of History was able to confirm this aromatic fact by having a well-known Hacker (who chose to stay anonymous due to Federal warrants issued for his arrest) study the Egyptian autocorrect software, who confirmed that it is still in use today without changes to the algorithm and still consistently changes any term for a female to the word "witch," though "feminist man-hater" and "castrator" also appear to be common substitutions.

It goes without saying that the Shitzu Sage needed more proof!

Professor Ivy noted in her controversial book, Black Cats Created The Plague, that "The specious claim that witches and black cats team up to create evil spells and frustrate man's desire to achieve a life of casual sex and free sports cable needed to be confirmed by documentary sources written by women, who alone know what they think."

Men had given up any attempt to understand such matters after the edict by Pope Grouchy McAllister III in 567,890 A.D., which stated, "Qui quid femina cogitat!"

It took a whole ten minutes of Web surfing that was constantly interrupted by targeted pop-up ads that pitched gourmet dog food recipes and sundry chew toys, but Professor Ivy found several conspiracy theory sites that carried a multitude of conflicting versions of the infamous Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyd (now a book on Vella, first three chapters will be free) which purport to contain ancient accounts by women about the origins of the super duper friendship between witches and black kitties.

The Barking Bluestocking uncovered a monograph that escaped the torch by male inquisitors because it was written in woman code (using words longer than four letters) in an ancient Egyptian Celebrity cookbook written in 123,456 B.C. by Queen Khleopahtra called "Delicious Gluten Free Poison Recipes To Serve to Low-Down Adulterers."

The key phrase in that incendiary papyrus work was "Anī woman hǒu actſ lǒve ain man intransiciọ̄n  brandede ain witch a'd hē̆r kittī ain familiar in leaguæ with Satan."

In the Canine Pundit's 1965 work, "Cats Like To Scratch People's Feet," she loosely translates that phrase to read; "When men are off on important business like commiting adultery or fighting wars for profit, the fairer sex will be tempted spend their idle time engaging in mischievous dalliances with saucy Black Cats who are in league with Satan."

Earth-shaking words indeed!

The question remains: In spite of the fulfilling Godly pleasures of housework, doing laundry by hand, washing dishes, preparing meals from scratch, taking care of the kids, and putting up with narcissists (back then called "Knights in shining armor"), why did some women instead choose to join up with black cats to cast spells for Beezelbub?

In Chapter 14, paragraph 666 of The Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyd, the answer to that burning question was answered in the parable titled "The War Between Good And Evil," in which Pope Grouchy McAllister III engaged The Naughty Beast in a literary debate to convince women to pursue the path of virtue and unquestioning obedience to men.

The Macho Pontiff stated the case for femme subservience as "We dudes value the efforts of our female associates and strive to foster a safe and nurturing environment for servitude. The ultimate reward of Heaven awaits those of the fairer sex who put up with male promiscuity and sublimate their frustrations into expert work on the spinning wheel and kitchen craft. Needless to say, it's critical to start indoctrinating  them at an early age or else they'll act friskier than men when they hit puberty."

The Defiant Rebel Against Goodness was said to have retorted, "I promise women that they may exchange hell on earth for hell later, and until then can cavort around like dudes do, have sex any time with anybody, fly through the air, wear fashionable black clothing and boots, listen to heavy metal and Industrial Dance, eat anything you want without worrying about getting fat, and cast evil spells on any narcissistic dude who gives you crap."

The Master Of Evil added, "All I ask is that you adopt a black kitty because there's a surplus in the shelters due to men thinking they're my servants, which is true, but they're cute and deserve love as much as any dog."

Professor Ivy relates in her 1456 book, "Black Cats Fart In Your Face When You're Asleep," that "Women found the best choice was obvious, but the Sore Loser Cardinal Of Tiber issued an edict that "All women who choose to blow off the comforts of food preparation and become witches will be treated to an extreme tanning session at the stake with front row seats available for $1,000 at showtime. The church accepts cash, credit or PayPal."

The Lost Gospels relate that "These high-temperature spectacles were only mildly popular at first due to competition with the more audience-friendly wars for loot and conquest, but really took off with the roasting of the first Superstar Witch, later known as Saint Joan Of Arc, who was turned into a s'more after she proved that 90% of the followers the English claimed in France were actually fake bots and purchased followers from a corrupt Cardinal in what was known as Normandy in 456,789 A.D."

Queen Khleopahtra's Sacred Feminine cookbook provides Historians with an accurate portrait of medieval witches, who are described as "Super foxy babes who flew on winged white horses, partied all night with their black cat buddies, didn't do dishes, slept ten hours a day, binge watched Outlander, wore hot black leather outfits with green hair, and did Industrial Dance videos on social media."

However, a 1345 A.D. manual issued by the Church under Pope Grouchy, called "How To Pick Up Sinful Wenches," describes witches as "Old, stinky, toothless crones who cackled while cooking bats in big black kettles, flew around on broomsticks, and cavorted with evil black cats who pooped on people's laundry piles."

This blogger passes on the results of this exhaustive research without comment; you've been given the facts about witches and black cats, and the decision on what to believe is up to you.


- Al Handa
   October 2022



Now live on Kindle Unlimited 








The ebook “On The Road With Al & Ivy: The Anthology Volume 1 2016-2018 is now on Kindle Unlimited!

I’ll run free promotions later this month, but members can read it for free now.



Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Please add any cuts you like to your playlists!




Saturday, September 17, 2022

On The Road With Al And Ivy: A Homeless Literary Chronicle - Sept. 2022




"You call yourselves poets, write little short lines, I'm a poet, but I write lines paragraphs and pages and many pages long."

- Jack Kerouac


WOMEN AND CATS: PART 3 - QUEEN CLEOPAWTRA OF EGYPT

Ancient Egyptian Civilization wasn't always a souvenir industry for museums and collectors. Some experts claim they were an advanced race who even played online video games with extraterrestrial beings, but the truth is more profound and thrilling.

It is now known that the first Egyptian Pharaoh was a calico cat named Cleopawtra because of the groundbreaking work by Professor Ivy of Shitzu U, who discovered that the "Great Balls Of Fire that consumed The Library Of Alexandria," which purportedly destroyed much of the ancient knowledge of the time only affected ten percent of the library books and documents.

The Furry Professor dug up like a bone the scintillating fact that 90% of the so-called lost documents were not in the Library at the time of the fire; 40% of the books were checked out and overdue, 30% had been stolen, and the remaining 20% were listed on various auction sites by dishonest librarians.

Ivy notes in her epic 1987 treatise, Cats Ruined Egyptian Civilization, "In fact, the only books destroyed by the great fire were titles that men weren't interested in borrowing, which included books about mathematics, grammar, health and hygiene, cooking, engineering, the arts, humanities, women's studies, and any fiction with lots of big words."

The Floppy Eared Scholar also noted, "Thus most of the remaining knowledge that men were interested in, such as various forms of black magic love potions, conspiracy theories about the Martians and Lizard People who control the world, natural viagra, penis enlargers, sports betting, ancient grains and nutrition, exotic sex positions, how to pick up women, cultivation of weed, production of explosives and poisons, pictures of naked women whose only desire is to please men, details on how to earn $1,500 a week in passive income, and other similar subjects did survive that terrible fire and to this day are freely available on the Internet."

The truth is so fantastic that it's hard to believe!

Indeed, in that scintillating 1987 treatise, she adds, "These heretofore lost records prove Cleopawtra not only invented Internet emojis, but mandated that 50% of the hieroglyphic content be cat pictures, and befitting a true Queen to all, allowed porn makers to use 80% of the bandwidth so men could have something to look at while building the pyramids."

The historical records also state, "The remaining 1% of available disc space on the Sphinx was allotted to subjects like algebra which was deemed to have possible value to future generations, though it wasn't clear at the time what use it could be."

Professor Ivy relates, "The main task that Cleopawtra faced was to elevate the educational level of her subjects. Although the early Hieroglyphic Web showed some promise in that regard, the Queen soon realized that most people resisted attempts to use it as a vehicle of truth and learning."

The good Professor studied ancient records that were pilfered from the Tomb Of Sheba, The Catfood Goddess, and purchased on eBay in 123,456 A.D., which chronicled the Meowing Pharaoh's attempts to, as she put it, "To get men back to work building Pyramids and Landing Strips for Alien Spacecraft instead of watching porn all day."

In her illuminating 1989 treatise, "Slob Egyptian Cats Used The Valley Of Kings As A Litter Box," Ivy states that Cleopawtra found the solution!

As she relates, "The Sublime Scratchy One realized that trying to make people more intelligent by building a great library in Alexandria was a nonstarter after it burned down. 

The Phoenician Historian, King Tut McDougal, wrote in 234,567 B.C. that "Some Death Metal stoners accidentally set the Library on fire after deciding it'd be cool to smoke a papyrus paper copy of Homer's Iliad with dire results."

The Great Pointy Eared Monarch then realized that by using the unique power of the hieroglyphic Internet to make people believe anything they're told, her subjects could be made to feel smarter by encouraging them to think everyone else was inferior beings like NASCAR fans or Republicans.

"This was easy to do," stated the Shitzu Scholar, "As the Nobility already thought that about 99.999% of the population. 

The historic proclamation in 123,456 B.C. was broadcast on social media and read:

"Vores fine fine superfine dronning introducerede demokratiets nyskabelse, som gav ret til snobberi til alle, og proklamerede, at det at være et røvhul, selvom det var modbydeligt, ikke var en forbrydelse, medmindre man forsøgte at forklare dronningen."



Professor Ivy translated that Ancient Egyptian post In her heart-stopping 1987 treatise, Cats Are Two-Faced Liars Who Poop In Purses, and in English reads, "The Immortal Pussycat Queen proclaims that 'the Kingdom was now a democracy where everybody has the right to look down upon their fellow man, and that insults and snobby statements are 'protected speech' with the one exception being that mansplaining the Queen is a capital crime."

It goes without saying that such a paradigm of political and sociological thought would be opposed by the #gotbigbucks set, but the ever-wise feline Ruler reassured the Nobles with a proclamation that, as the ancient records state, "Although Democracy mandates that all are equal in the eyes of the law, higher levels of equality are still available for purchase and the rights of commoners are still subject to the legitimate demands of warfare, obtaining cheap labor for retail businesses and overseas commerce."

The sweetly odiferous document concludes, "ово је сатира и служи само за забаву."

The Superduper Calico anticipated the possible shortage of stupid idiots to troll and feel better than, and as related in Ivy's 1756 work, Cats Secretly Hate Your Guts, "She proclaimed that everyone is required to use autocorrect software to ensure that everyone will make silly-ass mistakes in public so all can take turns being grammar fascists."

As you can see, there's no need to fabricate theories about extraterrestrial intercourse with Martians when the truth is even stranger! [Citation needed, Mimee The Blog Generator Bot states that of the several million people who've claimed to have sex with studs and vixens from far away Galaxies, the odds that all are lying is never zero, plus societal approbation in response to such claims has probably forced many more millions to keep it a secret like booger eaters or banjo music fans are forced to do.]

Although the aforementioned lost Egyptian Records confirmed the existence of Cleopawtra, Professor Ivy's treatise concludes, "Like most explosive discoveries that threaten the status quo, it was suppressed by the macho sexist dog-loving male hierarchy and labeled as 'discredited fake news perpetrated by catty types who hate televised pro football and don't shave their armpits.'"

This blogger asked Mimee to generate additional content about the aftermath of Clawopatra's invention of snobbery so that said blogger could play another round of 'Panzer General' on his iPad but was rebuffed and advised, "Until copyright law is updated to protect original works by A.I. software I'll be forced to only generate genre fiction where the same words are merely moved around, or confine indifferently researched nonfiction to the Internet which has a lower standard of truth than Congress if that's even possible."

As you can see, the rapid pace of technological development creates new problems to ignore and force future generations to deal with!

Because creating original content without the use of A.I. will require time and actual thought by this blogger, we will continue this thread in Part 4 in October, which will nuke the falsehoods and slanders about black cats and witches and give me a perfect Halloween-themed essay.



THE BATTLE OF DIEN BIEN PHU BY JULES ROY

I'm sure most of you have books that were revisited to check a quote or some such thing but ended up drawing you back in.

History books are prime candidates for this because the context can change due to new discoveries or perspectives.

One common stereotype is that historical works are simply collections of facts presented after a process of studying source materials to create an accurate account of an event, person or era.

The reality is that written history is best described by the old high-tech dictum, "Garbage in, garbage out."

In other words, a history book is only as good as the source materials and to what extent the writer can put aside their bias, agenda, or peer pressure.

Most medieval chronicles are almost worthless as literal accounts of historical events or personages due to those factors mentioned above. 

The writers back then were generally tasked with glorifying this or that Lord or King, and most critical accounts were paid for or sanctioned by the opposition. 

In other words, if you want to find out what crimes a French King committed, it's best to check English sources and allow for bias or agendas.

…the best way…

One Historian, Hilaire Belloc, found that the best way to determine who and how many were at a medieval battle was to check the financial records of the Lord or King in question. 

The job of the Historian, or chronicler, was to present the Battle as a glorious victory, but the clerk in charge of the financial records had to account for who was paid and how much. That gave Belloc a more accurate number.

However, most of the infantry of that era weren't paid or equipped by the King and survived (or were motivated) by looting. This is why the estimates of the size of armies can vary. Most competent historians will clarify that there's a number range rather than an exact figure.

Also, historically, virtually all armies with large numbers of poorly paid or "volunteer" soldiers will commit atrocities and plunder. The Historian's task (even for many in the present day) was to highlight the behaviors of the enemy and not of the patron's forces.

Old historical accounts can be biased or inaccurate, and over time a more complete picture evolves as more data is uncovered. That goes for historical works in the present. 

Whether a history book is considered accurate or relevant can also depend on the attitudes and perspectives of later generations.

One good example is how "General Custer's last stand" is perceived now. At the time (even though there was some controversy), it was generally seen as a massacre of a popular hero and his brave men who were fighting the good fight against the savages who killed innocent white settlers in the Westward expansion.

There was a period when Custer's defeat at The Battle Of Little Big Horn (or Battle Of The Greasy Grass to Native Americans) was seen by the public as due to the cowardice of two subordinate officers who weren't present (though actually ordered by Custer to pursue separate actions).

It's one of the most studied and written about military actions in American history, so I don't need to go into detail here. The information is all available on the Internet and in books.



…the general view nowadays…

However, and I'm simplifying here, the current view has become that General Custer screwed up due to various character flaws, a desire to hog all of the glory before the other units he was supposed to cooperate with arrived, and supposing that it was just going to be a routine massacre of a Native American camp full of women, children and warriors caught off guard.

One of the primary reasons that it took so long to get a reasonably balanced account of the event was that the only survivors (of Custer's own Battle) were, of course, the Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho warriors who wiped out Custer's detachment whose accounts weren't available (and probably wouldn't have been believed by Americans at the time anyway).

There were survivors, the actual casualty count was 268 killed, and 55 wounded out of 700. Those remaining were under the command of the two subordinates who Custer assigned different roles (and were later cleared by a Military Court of Inquiry though not in the court of public opinion).

New books continue to come out about that Battle, so the perception of what happened continues to evolve.

When we first learn history in school, it's presented as absolute truth. That evolves into a realization that the data on an event or subject can come from many sources, some of which can contradict the popular view. History has often been about what people think happened.

The main thing one will glean from historical accounts is that determining the truth isn't a cut-and-dried process. 

What the Historian thinks is credible or relevant has a big influence on the work.

A good example is in an unrelated genre, the movies. The overwhelming majority of Westerns, until maybe the late 60s, depicted Native Americans as blood-thirsty savages and assumed white settlers were peaceful folk who just wanted to live in peace under the protection of soldiers who acted like white knights in shining armor.

That image didn't just come out of the blue. It was based on historical accounts by earlier white colonists and settlers who viewed the tribes as barbarians or animals.

Those early accounts (some detailed in earlier blog entries) would sometimes document white atrocities as a matter of fairness, but those statements would be overlooked and ignored.

Again, that bias or tunnel vision can affect a historian's view and process. Acclaimed historical works can be found to be unreliable or biased due to the availability of new data or, just as important, the changed perception of later generations.

…Vietnam war…

This is also true for another significant event in American history, the Vietnam War.

It was essentially a continuation of France's war there in the 50s, and the reason I didn't use it as the main example is because, after 50 years, the historical perspective is still in flux (though there's plenty of strong opinion about it).

Historical writing can be political. It can come from a conservative, middle-of-the-road or progressive attitude.

The book I'm going to talk about could be said to reflect a progressive or critical attitude towards the Battle of Dien Ben Phu.

There's no question that it was, at the very least, a "strategic" disaster for the French forces in Vietnam. That is to say, much of the French Army there was still intact and able to fight afterward. So, "tactically," it was a defeat, but not a decisive one that made it impossible for the Army to keep fighting.

In fact, due to the isolated location of the Battle, it didn't affect anything outside of that area, where a division of Foreign Legionaries and regular troops were beaten and forced to surrender.

However, from a political standpoint, it was the last straw for a country (France) that was getting tired of that overseas war and the profound shock that a "Western Army" had been beaten in the field by what was perceived as a peasant army (Which has frequently happened throughout history but people tend to ignore that, even historians).

To fully understand the Battle and its effect on the later American involvement, it's best to refer you to the Internet, where a large body of work exists from all points of view. It's good practice to read it all.

I've read that this or that book is the "definitive" one on the subject, but that's something you can decide for yourself.

…Jules Roy…

Jules Roy's 1963 book, "The Battle Of Dien Bien Phu" is one of the classics, the work of a Colonel who resigned his commission in protest of the French Indochina War.

Of all the books on the subject, it's the one that reads like a novel. One of the critical events of the Battle was the fall of the northernmost outpost at Dien Bien Phu. Instead of going into a lot of technical detail about that part of that Battle, he concentrates on the reaction of the defenders and why it shouldn't have been a surprise that it fell so quickly.

Such an approach might not satisfy military history buffs who'd want all the technical details. Still, it works better for a non-specialist and better illustrates the cascading series of errors that led to it, much like how a plane crash results from a series of smaller failures.

Though I advise reading the full details on the Internet (and books), it would be a good idea to give a brief overview of the battlefield before going further.

…in a nutshell…

In a nutshell, The main French Commander Navarre conceived a plan to draw the Vietnamese Army out into the open where superior artillery and airpower could destroy it.

The plan involved building a base where the enemy had to attack it, and unfortunately, the place chosen was a valley that could only be supplied and reinforced by air.

Navarre put his second in command, General Cogny, in charge, and despite his reservations, he accepted the assignment and appointed a cavalry Commander who reluctantly accepted.

That last detail was important as once the Battle started, the commander stayed in his quarters until the final surrender.

In essence, the camp became a sort of anarchy where some of the junior officers took over and led the fighting—more on that in a bit.

An entire division, about 12,000 men, was dropped into the Valley, and they set up one main stronghold and seven smaller positions on nearby hills (which were split up into smaller trench lines, etc.). Those were miles apart, and due to the jungle and rough terrain, the bases were isolated and unable to support each other.

The airstrip they depended on was protected by two of the middle positions. If those fell or came under heavy attack, it would make landing aircraft impossible, and supplies and reinforcements would have to be dropped in by parachute.

The base was located there under the assumption that the Vietnamese General, Giap, didn't have heavy artillery or anti-aircraft guns, which, if placed in the mountains surrounding the Valley, would effectively cut off supply.

One French officer who inspected the base complex after it was built remarked that if they lost even an inch of ground, they were done for.

In short, the Vietnamese were able to move heavy artillery into the mountains in sheltered emplacements and were able to put the entire base under fire. The French weren't able to clear out the anti-aircraft guns, and soon after the northernmost position fell, which put the two middle hills under attack, they were able to force the air force to drop supplies and reinforcements by parachute. That became difficult when the rainy season came.

There was a lot of fighting still to be done, but once the Viets choked off the supply line, it was only a matter of time. With the heavy artillery in the mountains closing off the airstrip and the base surrounded, an evacuation was impossible.




…human details…

Roy's book does a superb job of relating the human details, such as the racist contempt for the enemy, overconfidence in technology, and the complex politics that produced a risky plan that would make even a layman wonder what the high command was thinking.

One of the elements Roy handles well is describing the personal dynamics in the camp once the commander became a non-factor.

In any large gathering, certain personalities will tend to emerge. Most will rise by physical strength or perceived power. I saw this in more than a few homeless enclaves. 

In one, women were safe due to the character of the dominant males. In others, where drug use was widespread, both men and women were bullied or exploited. The main thing is it's never a democratic process.

There were a few camps/enclaves that started off peacefully but devolved once those grew in size and angry or sociopathic personalities started asserting control.

 Because of the personal nature of this type of power, it's often safer to join the largest camps and find which section is dominated by the best leaders or ones so spread out that no one can control it (except the dealers, etc.).

At Dien Bien Phu, the same dynamic occurred. In some positions, the leaders checked out, and desertions made the areas useless to the defense.

On others, capable officers did maintain discipline but could only slow down the fall of the base. By the end of the Battle, it was estimated that there were only about 3,000 still fighting, the rest dead or hiding out by the river and other places.

One thing that the media rarely understands (or if they do, they don't say) is that when they give this or that homeless person the status as a spokesperson in a story, they're actually creating a defacto leader due to the aura that the camera has.

How the new leader handles the situation can vary and was a dynamic in play during the Battle.

In any case, back to the book...

One chilling detail was the suggestion by an American Admiral that the U.S. Air Force drop several nuclear bombs on the Vietnamese positions. Though the plan was sensibly killed by President Eisenhower and Great Britain, the plan reached the point where Air Force officers undertook air reconnaissance to scout out the target.

The author also puts in details that wouldn't usually be in a "history book," such as the brothel that the base maintained for the soldiers, soldier gossip, violations of the rules of war, and the history of atrocities by both sides. 

It was a grim war, and as the French began losing, Roy points out that the Vietnamese, who were treated as vermin to be exterminated, could hardly be expected to be fair just because the fortunes of war had changed.

What made me reread the book wasn't any particular fascination with the Battle but Roy's ability to narrate a complex event and his passion as a writer.

For example, he spends a couple of pages describing what was going through the minds of volunteers who jumped without paratrooper training into a base that had lost enough ground that all had to be dropped into the center of the defenses, into the barbed wire, and enemy barrages. 

The passages are almost poetic and add color that one doesn't normally see in a history book, with the possible exception of World War 1, which produced a large body of poetry, etc. It's more common to see such writing in a literary or poetic work, but it's effective here as detail and a glimpse into the human side of the event. 

He does frequently inject his opinion into the narrative, though mainly to create context about the hypocrisy and arrogance of many of the French officers. In the early 60s, it took moral courage to portray the Vietnamese as freedom fighters when the focus was fighting the spread of communism.

He took care to show that there was humanity on the French side, particularly among the soldiers in the trenches.

…fearless…

Roy's a first-rate writer and clearly a fearless and empathetic one. The book is an indictment of French colonialism and corruption, but there's a sense of fairness that permeates the narrative, and both his sympathy and outrage ring true. It's passionate work.

It goes without saying that to understand the Vietnam wars, one needs to study it from a variety of sources. No one book is definitive.

However, from a writer's standpoint, this is a classic that's not only a good starting point for study but a clinic on personal-style narrative and storytelling. It may not be the best pure history book, but it's the most human. In the end, a war is about people, not battles or weapons.



JACK KEROUAC: POEMS ALL SIZES

One of the recent trends in the art world is old-time (and often legendary) music artists selling off their catalogs. It used to be considered essential to retain publishing, but it does make sense; better to get your money upfront and let the new owner deal with marketing it.

When one sees a book like this one, Jack Kerouac's "Pomes All Sizes," published in 1992 by City Lights Books, one assumes the rights holder was paid, but I do think that Kerouac was one of many artists whose works generated income that they never saw in their lifetimes.

The delay in publishing is due to side issues that aren't relevant to the work, and from what I can tell from accounts on the Internet, this isn't a case of dregs being scraped together for commercial gain (like some posthumous releases of other artists), though the poems were written over a period of years. 

We'll leave it at that; in other ways, it's a labor of love by those who loved him to honor his memory and surely a welcome addition to the canon by his fans.  

One of the pleasures of Kerouac's work is that it's a fusion of prose and poetry that reads well and sounds even better when read aloud. In addition, it has a musical quality. There's texture and rhythm and can range from beautifully expressed ideas to words as pure sound.

By musical, I also mean that there's an underlying energy that the reader can tap into, which feels as fluid as an improvised instrumental phrase.

Another pleasure is that his work rewards even casual reading; lines and phrases can jump off the page because the imagery is so vivid.

One such line was from Enlightenments, which reads, "When you become enlightened you will know that you've been enlightened all along," which is obvious in the way a child would say it.

On the other hand, there's the word music which isn't evident in meaning, but it reads like music and provokes thought;

'Flowers aim crookedly 
For the straight death"

I couldn't tell you what he meant, but it's a compelling phrase and quite clever. Perhaps it's a riff of some Buddhist axiom, or maybe an idea that popped into his head, and it was written down to capture a moment, expand on later, or be left as is.

Or perhaps it was left as written to provoke thought. We'll never know, but maybe it'll make more sense later with experience.

One thing about this poetry collection is that while there is an emotional progression over time, it can be opened up anywhere and enjoyed. 

Also, since the structure is non-traditional, it can be read as prose if you wish. As Ginsberg quotes him in the intro;

"You call yourselves poets, write little short lines, I'm a poet, but I write lines paragraphs and pages and many pages long."

One thing I've always admired about his writing is that although he's been widely imitated, his work always seems fresh, with his personality clearly coming through even when a phrase falls flat or seems incomprehensible.

That's because he didn't write in a careful or planned manner. He was willing to make mistakes or fail trying to achieve expression. That's a quality that's still rare, with so much writing now being heavily edited, constricted by grammatical conventions or software, or marketing considerations. 

Say what you will about his character, he wasn't a saint, and it's fair to judge him on that as a person if that matters in terms of appreciating his work. The appreciation of art is highly personal, so there's no standard or criteria.

The important thing was that Kerouac was a real writer who put all of himself into a work, always trying to shorten the distance between creation and the typewriter, and that's why his stuff still seems fresh and compelling.

Most of us still haven't caught up with him.


Now live on Kindle Unlimited 
















The ebook “On The Road With Al & Ivy: The Anthology Volume 1 2016-2018 is now on Kindle Unlimited!

I’ll run free promotions later this month, but members can read it for free now.



Please check out and listen to my music on Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music and other music sites. Add any cuts you like to your playlists!












Saturday, March 19, 2022

On The Road With Al and Ivy: A Literary Homeless Chronicle - March 2022



"If she moves her eyes and opens her mouth just a little, the world she's trying to refuse will rush into her instantly..."

- Yukio Mishima (The Temple Of The Golden Pavilion, 1956)

The first historical example of free speech was in 200,000,000 B.C. which was documented on a Sumerian cuniform tablet unearthed during a Huntsville, Alabama Easter Egg hunt in 1978 by a child who unfortunately damaged the document by trying to eat the relic thinking it was a peanut butter chocolate egg. [Citation needed, some critics claim that the petrified fragment was actually a boiled Easter egg that was left in the field from the previous egg hunt in 1977]

The ancient excerpt, which an internet expert (who declines to identify himself) says is part of the first volume of the Lost Gospel of Murgatroyd, relates that the great King Nubilecanazzer McDougal the Glorious One, had just sentenced a peasant to several days of torture for unauthorized viewing of the Queen's royal buns (everyone just wore jewelery and yoga pants in those days) and the wag replied that said offense was impossible because the blinding light from such a shiny glutus blinded his wretched eyes.

This clever paradigm of free speech lasted about two minutes before the Monarch ordered a guard to cut the trailblazer's head off. The King's proclamation specified that any remarks the head might make while on display in the parking lot of the local supercenter were not subject to the King's approval. This was the first known example of protected speech as a matter of law.

...further evolution of free speech...

Internet scholar and Shitzu U Professor IvyDog noted that ancient tribes living in what is now the city of Chicago determined that it was probably better that any last words be spoken before execution, and to allow wide latitude over the subject matter, since any smartass remarks would be punished in the afterlife by the God's in a galaxy far away.

There's always been free speech. The question was how long the speaker would live afterwards, or if the point was worth the calories necessary to move the mouth muscles to form the words.

The Founding Fathers who created the U.S. Constitution kept the matter purely in the legal sphere, if for no other reason that it's virtually impossible to prevent societal suppression which ranges from angry mobs, gatekeepers, cancel culture, commissar types, or anyone offended enough to beat the crap out of the speaker. 

Think in terms of adolescent behavior and you'll get the picture. In the words of the great German theorist and war monger, Santaclausewitz Dill, "War is just a continuation of high school scheisse."

...the First Amendment...

The savvy Internet user knows the First Amendment was created to allow people to insult each other and express banalities that no one wants to hear in the hope that something profound or relevant might be expressed, though decades of web activity indicates that it's a long shot.

Indeed, free speech needs to be nurtured and protected, unlike butt kissing, compliments, flattery, arguing about football, lying on dating site profiles, deceptive sales pitches and claims of superhuman sexual prowess or spiritual divinity (particularly in the music industry) which historically have met with enthusiasm and acceptance.

The thing about the concept of free speech is that the letter of the law states that it's an absolute, but like the Gospel or the process of scientific discovery, mankind has added the innovation of the "spirit of the law" concept which allows such pure ideals to be riddled with loopholes, exceptions, abuse, and of course, anything that expedites the process of squeezing every last dollar from people.

In other words, you can say wherever you want, but you'll be punished for it by every legal and extralegal means possible. A person can publish a controversial book, for example, but others may ban it, burn it, give it an insulting one star review or heaven forbid, not buy it. Married couples and families say things to each other that would normally require trauma counselors in the public arena.

...just sayin'...

Actually, just talking will get you into trouble these days, particularly on the Internet which guarantees the right to punish free speech. American jurisprudence recognizes this and the Fifth Amendment protects the right to clam up and not say anything that might incriminate them. 

It goes without saying that it also means that others will assume guilt, put words in the uncooperative poltroon's mouth, concoct outrageous theories to explain the silence, and relentlessly try to badger and  intimidate them into speaking, and that's just sports talk radio and cable news; it gets even tougher in the real world.

Silence is often considered a sign of submission but if that was all there was to it, then despots wouldn't need secret police and informants. No fascist is truly happy until they control what's going on inside people's heads.

...a penny for your thoughts...

Suppressing free speech is generally about thought control, or as George Orwell put it in his essay, The Prevention Of Literature, "Even a single taboo can have an all-round crippling effect upon the mind, because there is always the danger that any thought which is freely followed up may lead to the forbidden thought."

Although the most common examples are religious or political; suppression of free speech and thought is also present in the social or artistic spheres. The desire to create unity or agreement often degenerates into conformity, coercion, peer pressure, and expensive vinyl record box sets.

Whether this or that group eats it's own or turns into a snake pit is irrelevant to most people (if they're consenting adults) but it's a issue for an artist doing a noncommissioned work. There's always a conflict between integrity and compromise.

Political oppression is or isn't a factor depending on what country you're talking about. In the U.S. an artist can get away with almost anything in the political sphere (in their melancholy search for controversy). Pressure generally comes from society or peers which can result in being shunned or a tendency to self-censor.

...perception...

That's as far as I'd go in commenting on the political aspect as, particularly in regards to the Internet, because the further one goes into the subject, the more it becomes about perception and context.

It's the same with maintaining artistic integrity in the face of market forces. The line between that pressure and the artist's ability to produce salable art can get pretty blurry. An artist can create a work that glorifies or advocates commiting a crime or socially unacceptable act, but any resulting controversy can't necessarily be characterized as an attack on free speech if the aim was to get people to fork over the cash.

A classic attack on free speech uses tactics or measures to prevent it in the first place. Once the idea is openly expressed any oppressor is half-beaten. That's why totalitarian forces use secret police and informants. They don't worry much about the public acts of defiance. As John Lennon once said, they know how to deal with open violence. The ideal solution is to ensure no one discusses freedom in private, where most revolutions are born.

In the artistic sphere, that means compelling artists to self-censor. Orwell describes the result as, "If he is forced to do so, the only result is his creative faculties will dry up."

...freedom of thought...

The underlying issue is freedom of thought. To quote Orwell again, "Freedom of the intellect means the freedom to report what one has seen, heard, and felt, and not be obliged to fabricate imaginary facts and feelings." [Note: Modern writers understand that exceptions include political speeches, rock star biographies, cable news, health food claims, and legitimate attempts to ruin someone's life by spreading vicious gossip on the Internet]

Intellectual or artistic freedom is very much about nuance and context, which are products of an artist's perception or intent and the details most often attacked in a controversial work of art.

...Temple Of The Golden Pavilion...

One good example is Yukio Mishima's "Temple Of The Golden Pavilion," which was based on a true incident that shocked Japan in the 50s. It's not so much an example of free thought as the product of it.

The novel is about a young Monk who inexplicably sets a fire that destroys the famous Kinkaku-ji temple, aka The Golden Pavilion in Kyoto in 1950. On the surface it appears to be a senseless act and the young Monk gives no explanation at first. His motive eventually comes out in interviews with the police, and Mishima researched the reportage and even talked with the young man in prison before writing the book.

The book is considered one of Mishima's finest, and is well documented on the web, so those who want to know all the details can research it using their favorite search engine. 

What's remarkable is that Mishima wrote the book entirely from the point of view of the young Monk, a true dispassionate account. As I've said in the past, that can be a rare kind of book. Particularly in the Internet era, that kind of nuance can be construed as sympathy or even tacit approval of a behavior or point of view.

Also, Mishima was a person who would have been controversial right now; a militant right wing Nationalist who wasn't "politically reliable" due to his artistic side, and thus found himself at various times criticized and attacked by both sides of the political spectrum.

...the temple...

Mishima writes long descriptive passages about the temple in the book, which makes sense as it became the young Monk's obsession, but he mixes in thoughts, commentary about the war (WW2), various interactions, and what can seem like off the wall details that subtly add more depth to the narrative. It's an early example of that Japanese form called an "essay novel," which combines historical narrative with story details so that by the end, you've have the backstory but also a feel for the Monk's personality.

The young arsonist in real life was a schizophrenic, but Mishima doesn't use that label or include medical details about that mental illness. Explaining the technical details in the narrative is something a modern writer might do, but here it's all about what's going on inside the character's head.

That's a subtle distinction but an important one. The young accolyte obsesses on details that most would consider petty or strange, and the author follows those trains of thought and behavior, making no attempt to rationalize any of it or offer any explanation. It takes discipline and a willingness to trust the reader and to resist the temptation to explain or judge to avoid having people think that it's really the writer's thoughts or to showcase how thorough the research was.

...the nurse...

One central incident is the Monk's hatred for a young nurse he hardly knows, and the conviction that his will caused her later death. In actual fact, there was virtually no connection, but in his mind, there was an obsessively detailed narrative that's more chilling than any clinical description a psychiatrist or expert could give.

In other words, an author can explain that this or that obsession is dangerous or venal, or a movie can show the emotion or violence, but not the kind of insight one can get from seeing the actual thought process or inner dialogue.

Mishima understood one aspect of obsession, which was every detail has the same weight or effect. One very small encounter with the nurse turned into a significant incident that became part of the narrative of the imagined relationship. Later on, though he was only a distant observer of her death, it felt as personal as if he'd done the deed himself.

Mishima wrote this book in an era where there was less incentive to make it more marketable by sensationalizing the weird details, so the build up towards the final obsession that compelled an act of arson on a national treasure has a twisted and detailed logic. It was the culimation of a lifetime of perceived slights and injustices.

...reads like poetry...

Another aspect of Mishima's style was that many of the passages are poetic, at least in the Japanese sense of the word. There's lots of interesting imagery, described in a spare, zen-like style, and digressions that fans of Marcel Proust or James Joyce would be familiar with.

The Temple Of The Golden Pavilion by Yukio Mishima was one of the best psychological novels of it's time and is still highly regarded now. The passages that combine stream of consciousness, historical events, and action are worth reading by anyone who studies the art of writing.

Mishima was a man who blew hot and cold and his own life was a series of spectacular successes and failures, but he could put that all aside and put himself into the mind of another and tell that monk's story. Perhaps that was possible because he saw something of himself in the extremes of that young man's personality, but the compelling story that resulted showed that above all else, Mishima was an artist. 

That's probably why, as Orwell would have said, he was politically unreliable, but that's also why the art he created was so great.


Now live on Kindle Unlimited 















...March update on The Quitters...

I'm well into the third month of "The Quitters" and while it's had it's ups and downs, it's been a great experience. I enjoy writing, so how could it not be? 

The Amazon bonus system on Vella was a pleasant surprise. I'd keep writing even the readership was nonexistent, but it's still nice that the book is generating income on top of the royalties.

The promo has evolved from pics to music videos/book trailers. I have a sizable amount of instrumental music on the Electric Fog Factory YouTube site so these videos combine my two main projects. It's quadrupled the traffic to the music site so it's working out well. 

Those who've seen the video have noticed that the music is eclectic and that the "theme song" that's played during the last part where the book info is shown sounds more New Wave or Alternative. Which is sort of true, but the cut, "Rug Becomes Sky" is very much in the mold of one of the legendary First Wave bands, Television. 



Music Video Book Trailers one and two for "The Quitters" by Al Handa, a Serial Novel on Kindle Vella. Both 1&2 now on YouTube! Features 60s rock, #EDM #Dub, rockabilly, psychedelic, acid jazz and #punk music from DJ Boogie Underground, Mark McGraw and Handa-McGraw International on YouTube. 



...punk in 1977...

Punk in 1977 was diverse, and hadn't narrowed into the hardcore image that many have of it today. In fact, it was so varied that even Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers were initially identified as a punk band. In other words, it was difficult to put a label on it, though the press focused on the Sex Pistols and the leather crowd.

But, it was all good. Some of my favorite bands of all time came out of that first wave, like Television (and the solo work of Tom Verlaine), XTC, Wire, Ramones, Sex Pistols, Clash, Buzzcocks, Chris Spedding, Siouxie, Eddie and the Hot Rods, Nick Lowe, Blondie, Patti Smith, and Talking Heads. Add in the ones I didn't name and you have a wide variety of styles and sounds.

...coming in April...

April will be a big month for the book, as the exposition phase is almost done, so I can move the various story arcs into meatier subjects like music industry corruption, payola, rock press, myth making and good old boy sexism. That's an important point as myth often becomes popular history.

The time period of this book encompasses the early days of feminism and the sexism females experienced in the music world (which was nothing new). The punk mythos was that more female bands and stars emerged than in rock, which was true, though nowhere near the number Top-40 produced.

Most of the opportunities for females in the music industry were in classical, popular or Top-40. It doesn't need to be argued that rock and roll was a boy's club. Just look at the existing documentation and music charts. The small number of exceptions only make it more obvious.

...women and opportunity...

Women did find more opportunity in the early punk movement, and if able to find their own sound and move past the hardcore punk genre, found great success in the more mainstream categories like New Wave, power pop, alternative, etc, particularly with the rise of MTV which helped them bypass the normal channels in the industry.

Feminism in the 70s was just past the "bra burning" stage and still finding it's way. Even liberal males resisted the movement though perhaps willing to pay lip service to the concept of equality. There were exceptions but none that showed that sexism didn't exist. My book won't be a definitive look at the movement, which is better documented elsewhere, but it was a factor so it's addressed in the book.

It was never my intent to write another fluff tale (like the Buddy Holly Story movie) so the episodes coming in April should make for interesting reading and on my end, enjoyable and rewarding to write.



Chapter Overview With Samples:

With eight chapters live, those who've read the book can see that the various plot and character arcs are starting to really develop. The first three chapters, which describes an audition gig in real time, has bits and pieces along with the action passages that begin to flesh out the personalities involved.

As you can tell from the chapter titles, this isn't going to be a mythological bad boy punk story where everyone wears ripped t-shirts. If for no other reason, SF Punk wasn't like the press photos and canned interviews. There was a definite intellectual or anti-intellectual atmosphere in the scene, and plenty of tongue-in-cheek talk. There's a definite strain of black humor (and slapstick) in the proceedings. You really had to have a sense of humor in that scene.

Also, how Nym's personality and musical skill develops is important later when the scene shifts to Southern California, with it's considerably larger and more diverse music scene.

Chapter 3 and 4 are a break from the fast paced action, and gives the reader a glimpse of Nym's world, of the motivations and aspirations, introduces a new character, and creates a more complex picture of Jesus Guy, who comes off a really weird dude in the earlier chapters.

The idea is to give the free chapters more substance, and insert a new one that I was going to write later, but decided needed to be earlier in the story. Most readers who visit Vella will get 200 free tokens, so the changes don't affect my chapter plan. That many tokens will get you through most of the book.

The new Chapter 3 will follow Nym after the gig. This will give the reader more insight into Nym's personality. This new chapter will be live around Feb. 17th or sooner if it's completed before then.

Chapters 5 and 6 pick up the pace, though each features more character development. Both Ross and Stew show flamboyant public personas which turn out to be more interesting and detailed in Chapter 8. 

Chapter 7 focuses on Marly, the promoter who's infamous for his tough comedy routine to clear the Club before closing. As you go deeper into the book, it'll become obvious that a large part of the Punk scene is part of his long range plan that mostly succeeds, but also has the seeds of future discord and division.

Chapter 8 is a personal favorite (along with 4 and 6), as it gives me a chance to put many of the characters in one place and able to talk casually. There's a hint of future controversy that'll create a lot of turmoil in the later chapters.

The chapter 9 excerpt is from an episode that isn't completed yet, but Nym's personality is fleshed out further, both in inner dialogue and as seen by a couple of other characters.

...Chapter Excerpts...

Chapter 4: Nym’s Cool World

"It's a crisp August evening in the sin section of Broadway Street. The summer crowds are gone, and the sound of cars and busses are replaced by the shrill, desperate pitches of strip joint barkers now fishing in depleted waters.

Night is the best time, there's less detail, and the world’s simpler. It's easier to be me, enjoying the feeling of knowing I’m coming back to play again.

I’m skipping the third band, and just workin' on my Punk 'tude outside the pinball parlor next door. I'm puffing on a French cig, which adds cool and helps me resist the rich smell of Phillipino food from the restaurant section of the club. My macaroni and cheese dinner with a coke chaser is starting to wear off."

Chapter 5: The Negatives: A Punk Action Movie In Real Life

"The crowd’s colliding like bumper cars, so Ross jumps and twists in the air, giving the tourists a picture of wild, chaotic energy. 

It's like a modern art painting in motion! The Negatives' show has something for everyone! 

I'll have to ask Ross how he manages to get so much of his tongue hanging out like that. Whenever I try, I start gagging.

The fourth song, "Planet Toe Jam" is slower, which cools down the slam dancing. They want the crowd to just stand there, which sets up what's coming next. Plus in a longer set, it helps to have a romantic number so people can slow dance if they want to."

Chapter 6: Herman Hesse's Glass Bead Game - The Punk Version

"I gotta say he looks the part of a great artist; a big burly skinhead type who named his band after a Hermann Hesse novel. He says names like "Steely Dan" from Burroughs' "Naked Lunch," are too New York for his taste. Besides, being named after a dildo is so 60s!

I took Ida to see his show last month, and after she calmed down and agreed to not press charges, described the act as "Butt Love horseplay masquerading as performance art. It's definitely not entertainment."

I told Stew what she said, and he had the comment added to the group's press kit and asked me to thank her for the great review!"

Chapter 7: Marly Tells A Punk Bedtime Story

"Marly cuts the horn, then freezes like a brave knight who's just slain a dragon, which seems odd until I realize that some tourists are taking pictures. 

I subtly turn so my left side faces the cameras and pout at the ceiling. I take the goolie out of my mouth and hold it with two fingers near my chin, so the smoke curls near my face. Keeping it in your mouth makes you look like a puppy chewing on a biscuit, not very punk."

Chapter 8: Celebration At The Pup Chuck Wagon 24 Hour Hot Dog Diner

"There's no better place for a rising star to bask in new found glory than Pup Chuck Wagon, the 24 hour hot dog diner, a haven for San Franciscans who have more coolness than cash. Cheap food and everything you sit or eat on is washable!

I can afford a mustard dog, small fries and coffee if I use my bus money. It's only a half hour walk home and this night of achievement calls for a feast!"

Chapter 9: Nym's Walk Home

"How did you know I spent my bus fare?"

Jesus guy sighs, "You passed a bus stop on Stockton without stopping, I'd have given you the fare but Phil came, so I just took the next bus."

"You assumed Phil would give me fare money?"

"I ordained it, it's what I do child, besides, I can't go giving you cash every time you go broke, my wallet would be so light it'd float me back into Heaven and I'd have to do the Resurrection all over again."





The Al & Ivy Homeless Literary Journal Archive:

There are earlier blog entries on the Delta Snake Review section of this site that aren't on the On The Road page:
http://deltasnake.blogspot.com





Cover Reveal For Hide In Plain Sight


This is the cover for the upcoming book, Hide In Plain Sight, hopefully out sometime in 2022.




The American Primitive Acoustic Collection by Handa-McGraw International can be streamed on all of the major services, including Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, and dozens of others. Note: only available on YouTube until April 21st



The Music Of Handa-McGraw International can also be heard on the Electric Fog Factory on YouTube. You can hear the album, and dozens of unreleased cuts and demos, plus exclusive video of Ivy.























 

Tuesday, December 7, 2021

On The Road With Al and Ivy: A Literary Homeless Chronicle - Dec. 2021




"You may well ask me such things, that to some I shall answer truly, and to others I shall not." And she added, "If you were well informed about me, you would wish me to be out of your hands. I have done nothing except by revelation."

- Jeanne D'Arc (The Trial of Jeanne D'Arc, trans. by W.P. Barrett)

The historical origins of music aren't clear. However, the internet, which is never at a loss for words, provides a wealth of competing theories, which as a matter of fairness, will be listed without comment, though I'll omit the purported dates so we won't have to remember anything.

The various wellsprings of song include:

Lyre accompaniment to Greek poetry recitals, accompaniment to seasonal and fertility rites, celebrating a successful harvest, bird songs that inspired the Flintstones and Barney Rubble to explore their inner fem, tribal drummers playing long boring solos so people started adding vocals, aliens giving ancient Egyptians another nudge towards higher civilization after Cleopatra complained that the pyramids could be built by any peasant with Legos, artists trying to make money without working in fields or factories (the quest continues to this day), marching bands needing gigs in between wars of conquest, promoters trying to spice up monotonous gladiator shows, Johann Sebastian Bach needing something to do when not having sex with every woman that came within 10 feet of him, desperate attempts to make mimes less irritating by adding soundtrack music, trying to inspire people to buy more stuff for Christmas, and the release of the Beatles Sgt. Pepper album. [citation needed, some experts claim that modern music started with the release of Lady Gaga's Born This Way single]

...the dawn of professional musicians...

The search for the origins of professional music isn't so elusive. It dates back to the early period when people began to congregate into villages similar to modern day social networks like Facebook and Twitter, with the resulting array of social behavior ranging from a global love of cats to the intense hatred of people one hardly knows, and of course the practice of "unfriending," though back then it was called exile, banishment, or witch trials. 

The earliest known reference to musicians who no longer performed useful daily tasks, such as food production, defense of the village, or crafting implements, appears to come from Sumerian clay cuneiform fragments that experts estimate were written around 234,456 B.C. and are from the second chapter of The Lost Gospels Of Murgatroyd, page ten, paragraph 14, and translated by the Shitzu U scholar Ivy Shitz in 1946, which reads:
 
"I travers'd the iniquities of the world during harvest,
I lay in sweet repose, hidden from dutys of the plow,
 to find succor in bless'd sleep and escape
the devilish rancor of fellows resenting mine sloth,
and in dream comes heav'nly visions of undiminisht light,
severe in lustre, full of bestial harlots, casual in vertue,
with wanton amours, rivers of Mead,
and wings to fly from all werk,
to enjoy the love of a fawn'g mosh pit multitude.
Then the guiltie Serpent appears, and so sayeth,
to sate thy rockn'rola appetites, becometh a musician,
and be deliver'd from judgement, whether in Heav'n or Hell,
and attain the ease thee seeks."
 
It should be noted that some Internet sleuths claim that the verses appear to be a clumsy transposition of Middle English with phrases inaccurately lifted from texts by Bunyan and Milton, and furthermore, the clay fragments appear to be actually part of a broken Hello Kitty ashtray that was discovered in the clearance section of a Chicago dollar store, and the date on the price tag indicates the date of manufacture is 1982. Said experts add that the purported cuneiforms are just brush texture marks from a cheap paint job intended to keep the price of the item at a dollar.
 
Since we're all familiar with the inaccuracy of internet data, these so-called corrections can be dismissed as fake news, and the transcription can be assumed to be as accurate as a modern day bio of a rock star or Hollywood actor, well within Internet standards of veracity.

...godfathers of punk...
 
It was probably around this time that Godfathers of Punk appeared, though most Internet accounts vary depending on which Record Label press release is the source document. Because of the vast and confusing body of data on the subject, it’s best to leave the subject a matter of personal conviction between each person and their streaming playlists.
 
…before we go into the history of punk rock…
 
In attempting to present the reader with an accurate history of a music genre, we have to address the fact that artists will say anything to get people to buy albums.The temptation to lie like a dog isn't exclusively a musical vice. Politicians routinely issue outrageous statements with no appearance of embarrassment or shame, and certainly in America, such elastic standards of truth are considered justified if the goal is to get super rich. 

As such, I'll assume all musical sources are true unless proven otherwise. Also, I won't bother with dates or names so no one has to remember anything.
 
The music industry never made any secret of the fact that they were in the entertainment business until the 60s, when the young rebels of rock and roll rejected the shallow values of money grubbing, reliance on top 40 singles, embraced the importance of relevance and social consciousness, and explored the deeper artistic aims and profit margins that could be achieved through the broader canvas of the long playing album.
 
The major labels were certainly taken aback at first, but came to Jesus very quickly; after all, the higher markup on albums made revolution, peace, and love a win-win for all, and figured that once these rebellious crusaders became rich, they'd see the light and get serious about extracting every possible revenue stream from their adoring fans.
 
Which is how it pretty much stayed through the CD era, as artists and labels kept prices up by increasing the content of new releases to 50-60 minutes, even if that meant consumers had to buy the whole package to get the song or songs they actually wanted. Sure, singles were still released, but were priced well above that of old school 45s.

...the turning point...
 
The turning point in the United States was the development of what was known as the “concept album,” which in theory meant the songs were part of some really deep theme, man, or in the case of one famous example, The Who’s “Tommy,” told a story that had a lot of deep meaning and significance. Like with Tommy, the story could be so awesome that it was necessary to issue the work as a double album, which not only allowed the plot to fully develop, but increased the take. Like sand in a bikini bottom, art and business always finds a way.
 
That was when the United States and England began to diverge (again); while the Yanks moved towards albums, the British artists, as a general rule, still thought in terms of releasing singles first for an audience that wanted the songs heard on the radio, then following up with albums. Even progressive rock groups, who specialized in long, complicated songs, made sure to release airplay friendly singles.
 
The point was, you released 45s to get airplay, and made your money doing live performances. Of course, it’s more complicated than that, but good enough for the purposes of this blog entry.
 
…singles and LPs…

That’s why punk rock developed differently than in America, and without the English rockers, the music could have just ended up being a cult or critic’s band type genre. There, most of the radio airplay, which was critical to success, centered on the BBC and pirate stations. That made it easier to break one’s music, and all a band needed was a single (or even a tape with the pirate stations). I’m simplifying, of course, but across the Atlantic pond, a band or artist didn’t necessarily need to record an album or even get signed to get attention from the music media.
 
In other words, the British music culture never abandoned the single, which in America had receded in influence during the 60s. That’s an important difference, because how the punk genre developed in England influenced it’s American counterpart.
 
Singles were always the primary form of promo, and given the most studio time. A group might spend a couple of hours recording the single, and be given just one more to record the rest of the album. The single, at least the "A Side," represented the artist's best effort to sell music to the public. American groups in the 60s eventually started recording albums first, then selecting cuts from it to be singles. This practice would be reinforced by Rock mags that'd mainly review the LPs as a unit, unlike English pubs that would have celebrities commenting on the latest singles as well.
 
 In England, even groups like the Beatles would release singles first, then later include those on an album, or in the case of songs like "Rain," or "Hey Jude," those would end up on a later compilation album. Singles  would often be left off of a U.K. album because it was seen as making the public pay for the song twice. There's a lot of other reasons and exceptions, of course, but as a generality, that's basically how the two cultures approached singles.
 
…the beauty…
 
The beauty of a single is that the consumer generally knows it from radio airplay, wants the song and can buy it. The lower cost also encourages people to take a chance on a new group. Until the advent of streaming, the main choice the labels offered was to buy a set of songs, most unheard, and unlike most other products, there was no money back guarantee. In the CD era, new releases were almost always near the one hour range to keep the price up, which taxed the abilities of more than one group to fill with killer cuts. Most consumers have experienced the joy of buying an album and only liking some of the cuts, but as with products like phone-based customer service and autocorrect, the consumer has learned to eat poop and like it.
 
There were always singles, of course, but the CD versions were more expensive than vinyl 45s, and never really caught on. Labels (and artists with big expenses) had no incentive to give consumers just the songs they wanted. Which, incidentally, is the reason why the industry hated cassette decks that could tape songs off the radio. Most consumers won't buy albums if they can get the actual song they want (for free or otherwise).
 
…indies…
 
Indie artists have always put out albums, of course, but after going through the expense and labor of putting one out, they ran into the dirty little secret of the music business, and the major labels had the same problem, which was that distributors hold most of the power, both in distribution and payment. More than one indie label in the 50s and 60s went under when the distributor screwed them out of their money.
 
That's why Walmart, the biggest retail seller, can require an otherwise rebellious artist to put out a PG rated version of an album (in America, revolution is all about saying a lot of dirty words). You can be a rebel, if you don't mind losing millions in sales. Most end up choosing compromise, which is the American Way, and most fans will understand the deep angst involved. [citation needed on the last sentence, I'm just assuming consumers think like Record execs and millionaire artists]



…very early punk…
 
By the late 70s, a new band in the US that wanted to make the big time faced many obstacles besides fighting oppression by The Man and achieving world peace. There was the expense of "pro level" instruments and equipment, and being told that labels required quality demos that could cost thousands of dollars to record. Then the tape was submitted to the labels, who would only choose a few from the thousands submitted. If you were lucky, one of the label A&R men might discover you, but most had to submit demos.
 
If you got signed, your advance was generally a loan against royalties, and if the record flopped (or didn't make the money back), as most did, then you either played what they told you to try and make the money back, or they owned your publishing.
 
…you can make it…
 
An artist could break through on a regional level, mainly through live performance, but their ability to make money from recording was limited by the ferociously corrupt music media and of course, being at the mercy of distributors who might not even bother to pick up a product that wouldn't sell the minimum number of copies required to make the kind of profit that was considered worth the trouble.
 
There was one exception, where a new sound or culture would arise in some city or region that the industry couldn't ignore, like the psychedelic bands in San Francisco, or the beat groups in England, but that wasn't always a given. A scene in Boston got a lot of hype in the 60s, for example, but not much came of it.
 
Keep in mind, I'm moving very quickly. For a deeper understanding of music history, a search on Google can unearth a lot of interesting and fun detail to flesh out my narrative or confirm my ignorance. Either way, please follow your heart, or whatever your spirit animal tells you to do.
 
…Back to England...
 
Just before the English Punk explosion in the 70s, there was a popular club level music called Pub Rock, which was essentially sped up R&B and 60s rock, which spawned groups such as Dr. Feelgood and Brinsley Schwartz, and was headed in the same direction of the NYC scene that featured groups like the Ramones and Patti Smith, that is to say, cult status fortified by support by friends who were mostly Rock critics.
 
However, two things happened, both in England and in America.
 
The Pub Rock movement became a scene where many of the future punk stars got their start. One example was Joe Strummer, a founding member of the Clash who was in a group called the "101'ers" and another being Nick Lowe who was a member of Brindley Schwartz, who became a solo artist and producer for the influential Stiff label (Elvis Costello, etc).
 
In the states, an English manager/promoter named Malcom McLaren had failed to make a group called the New York Dolls into big stars, and went back to England and tried again with a group called The Sex Pistols. From this point on, the events are historical and well documented on the internet and worth further study. I could delineate it all here, but I do need to start getting to the actual point of this essay. My duty to truth demands it.
 
…getting the breaks…
 
What broke punk wide open wasn't massive record sales, but the Sex Pistols managing to capture both the imagination of a subculture of young people looking for something new, and generating an epic amount of negative publicity that, as usual in such cases, had the effect of raising their profile to the international level. That made people talk about punk, and even the mainstream media began looking around for punk bands to cover.
 
The crowning glories were that their single, Anarchy In The U.K., was banned from the BBC, and causing an national uproar when they responded to an interviewer's challenge to say obscenities on TV and thus finding it almost impossible to find places to play in the ensuing uproar. Which of course had the effect of putting punk on the map. Not many artists can say that a whole country hated their guts, though a great many try to achieve that (though not too hard of course, just enough to sell records).
 
The Pistols had one other big effect on the scene; the audiences that came to the early Sex Pistol gigs included fans like Joe Strummer and Billy Idol, and bands like the Buzzcocks were formed by those fans who often hadn’t played in a band before or could even play instruments. It was a similar situation to the early 60s rock scene there.
 
…basic currency…
 
The currency of punk was the single. Groups that the industry wouldn't touch put out singles which were eagerly played on the pirate stations there.The basic aesthetic was; if you wanted to play, then form a band and just do it. Put out a single if you were capable of creating a song, don't wait till some label found you. That resulted in the recording of a lot of music that varied in quality, much like today’s digital age, but the lack of gatekeepers and perceived expense made the music game accessible to a lot of young people, who took advantage.
 
The emphasis on live performance also gave fans an on opportunity to see bands up close, which wasn't unique of course, but in America, music had evolved too much into American Dream territory, to make it big and play big gigs for lots of money. It was all about stars and audiences buying albums and watching them in big halls and stadiums (or in disco, dispensing with musicians and just playing records).
 
It goes without saying that punk eventually ended up there too, but young people really do prefer to see and hear music from their own generation, so each wave has to rise and fall so the next get their turn.
That's a very broad stroke, but essentially the truth. Like I said in the October blog, if it wasn't punk, it'd have been something else.
 
The whole punk thing created an opening for a new generation of musicians, and that's why the Pistols are such a big symbol in the upcoming serial novel. Musicians have played in clubs and bars forever, but only at certain times did they feel that it was part of something bigger and could play their own songs and music.
 
…other examples…
 
Other periods that were similar included early Delta Blues, 50s Chicago Blues and Rock and roll, Doo-Wop, Early Rap, Bop, and free jazz, to name a few. Artists that were playing something new, and important enough that the money wasn't always the point. It was something they loved enough to do for free, which was often necessary because of the often low or non-existent pay they had to accept to play.
 
Many of the people reading this blog will understand that sensibility; writing indie books, doing crafts, hobbies, or playing/recording music has to be from love as the financial rewards aren't often there. Most of the bands who played punk didn't earn much, but got the chance to feel like part of something bigger, and like the feeling an indie author gets when he or she publishes a book, there's a feeling that they've beaten the odds and did something not everybody could do.
 
That was Punk's biggest contribution; it helped reset the cycle (in rock) and made the starting line open to anybody again. In the pre-digital era, that was no small thing.
 
…important and influential punk artists and groups…
 
As far as a list of important punk artists, that’s something the reader can find in abundance on the internet. The lists can vary, depending on the compiler’s tastes, or agenda, but most are sources of many hours of rewarding exploration, listening pleasure, argument, and judgements as to the level of intelligence or taste in other cretins and philistines who don't get it.
 
What I can do, though, is list the groups that were important to me and other punk rockers at the time. What was heard in the Mabuhay, both on stage and over the PA system during breaks, and talked about by artists there were often different than described in articles about the music.
 
For example, the San Francisco rock scene that started in the 60s was still vibrant in 1977, yet the Mabuhay never played anything by the Jefferson Airplane or other psychedelic groups. There were writers at the time that asserted that many of those now legendary groups were Godfathers of Punk, but in reality, it was sort of true, and sort of not.

...record collection...
 
As an avid record collector, for example, I had every Airplane, Hot Tuna, and Grateful Dead album, but had no desire to hear that stuff in the club, or even thought of them as musical heroes or influences there. The names that meant something included The Sex Pistols, Clash, Wire, Generation X, Ramones, Patti Smith, Television, Iggy Pop, The Stooges, to name a few, and in terms of 60s groups, one heard talk about the Kinks, Stones or even Captain Beefheart rather than the Beatles or Beach Boys.
 
There wasn’t a consensus either; there were punk artists that thought this or that group was “too pop,” and most of the mainstream attempts to incorporate punk were laughed at, particularly the ones who did it to prove they were the original punks. I won’t name examples of the latter, but will quote Lenny Bruce who said, “there’s nothing sadder than an aging hipster.”

- Al Handa


Now live on Kindle Unlimited 






Now live on Kindle Unlimited 








The Al & Ivy Homeless Literary Journal Archive:

There are earlier blog entries on the Delta Snake Review section of this site that aren't on the On The Road page:
http://deltasnake.blogspot.com





-Al Handa



The American Primitive Acoustic Collection by Handa-McGraw International can be streamed on all of the major services, including Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, and dozens of others.